Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Estimation of Residual Stresses in Pipe-Ring Specimens by Incremental Hole Drilling and X-Ray Diffraction Method

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residual stresses are usually not considered in engineering calculations of components and structures, however, they are present more or less in most of components, such as castings, welded components, components produced by rolling, bending, etc. The main objective of presented research is to determine the residual stresses in seamless thin-walled pipes, i.e. in ring specimens cut out from hot-rolled pipes. Pipe Ring Notched Bend specimens cut out from a pipe are considered as an alternative to the standardized Single Edge Notched Bend specimen used for determination of pipe material fracture toughness. In this research, residual stresses in ten ring specimens are measured by two methods: Incremental Hole Drilling Method (IHDM) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). Hoop residual stress is considered as the most important one in pipes. Principal stresses, as well as orientation of principal coordinate system, are determined by IHDM, and subsequently, hoop residual stress is calculated. Direct residual stress in hoop direction is measured by XRD. All results are shown on diagrams up to the depth of 1 mm from outer surface of each ring. Direct comparison of results referring to residual stresses obtained by both methods of measurement is presented to conclude that measurement with XRD shows uncertainty at some depths of measurement, since that method of measurement gives results with some large local oscillations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Konar R, Patek M (2017) Numerical simulation of dissimilar weld joint in sysweld simulation software. Technical Gazette 24(1):137–142. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20150513074103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Szavai S, Kovacs S, Bezi Z, Kozak D (2021) Coupled Numerical Method for Rolling Contact Fatigue Analysis. Technical Gazette 28(5):1560–1567. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20201117124940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jovicic G, Nikolic R, Zivkovic M, Milovanovic D, Jovicic N, Maksimovic S, Djokovic J (2013) An estimation of the high-pressure pipe residual life. Archives of Civil and Mechanial Engineering 13:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2012.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Damjanović D, Kozak D, Marsoner S, Gubeljak N (2017) Residual stress state in pipe cut ring specimens for fracture toughness testing. Materialpruefung/Materials Testing 59(6):530–535. https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111038

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Damjanovic D, Kozak D, Gubeljak N (2019) The influence of residual stresses on fracture behavior of Pipe Ring Notched Bend specimen (PRNB). Eng Fract Mech 205:347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ASTM E 1820 - 13 (2013) Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  7. Matvienko YG, Gubeljak N (2015) RU 2 564 696 C1: Model for determining crack resistance of pipes. Russian patent of 2015 according to IPC G01N1 / 28 G01N3 / 20

  8. Evans JT, Kotiskos G, Robey RF (1995) A method for fracture toughness testing cylinder material” in Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 50, Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(94)00211-Y

  9. Dlouhy I, Gubeljak N (2008) Personal discussion about testing the thin pipeline wall by using modified CT specimen and especial developed testing device. Alger

  10. Gajdoš Ľ, Šperl M (2012) “Evaluating the Integrity of Pressure Pipelines by Fracture Mechanics” in Fracture Toughness of Metal Castings, Science and Technology of Casting Processes. InTech, pp. 283–310. https://doi.org/10.5772/51804

  11. Capelle J, Gilgert J, Matvienko Y, Pluvinage G (2009) Measurement of the resistance to fracture emanating from scratches in gas pipes using non-standard curved specimens. In: Security and Reliability of Damaged Structures and Defective Materials, pp. 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2792-4_7

  12. Mahajan G, Saxena S, Mohanty A (2016) Numerical characterization of compact pipe specimen for stretch zone width assessment. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 39:859–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koo JM, Park S, Seok CS (2013) Evaluation of fracture toughness of nuclear piping using real pipe and tensile compact pipe specimens. Nucl Eng Des 259:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.03.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tutluoglu L, Keles C (2011) Mode I fracture toughness determination with straight notched disk bending method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:1248–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bahmani A, Aliha M, Sarbijan JM, Mousavi S (2020) An extended edge-notched disc bend (ENDB) specimen for mixed-mode I + II fracture assessments. Int J Solids Struct 193–194:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.02.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aliha M, Bahmani A, Akhondi S (2015) Determination of mode III fracture toughness for different materials using a new designed test configuration. Mater Des 86:863–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. EN 10216 - 2 (2002) Seamless steel tubes for pressure purposes - Technical delivery conditions - Part 2: Non-alloy and alloy steel tubes with specified elevated temperature properties

  18. Xi-Feng Y, Chao Y (2019) Experimental research and analysis on residual stress distribution of circular steel tubes with different processing technique. Thin-Walled Struct 144:106268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lothhammer LR, Viotti MR, Albertazzi AJ, Veiga CL (2016) Residual stress measurements in steel pipes using DSPI and the hole-drilling technique. Int J Press Vessels Pip 152:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodrigues LD, Freire JF, Vieira RD (2008) Measurement of residual stresses in UOE-saw line pipes. Exp Tech 32:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00297.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mjaku M, Shala A (2018) Investigation of residual stress and strain in high frequency longitudinal pipes. Annals of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara - International Journal of Engineering 16(2):47–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Musrati W, Medjo B, Gubeljak N, Štefane P, Veljić D, Sedmak A, Rakin M (2018) Fracture analysis of axially flawed ring-shaped bending specimen. Procedia Structural Integrity 13:1828–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Damjanović D, Kozak D, Gubeljak N, Tropša V (2016) Proposal of new Pipe-Ring specimen for fracture mechanics. Procedia Engineering 149:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gubeljak N, Likeb A, Predan J, Matvienko Y (2013) Comparison between Fracture Behaviour of Pipe-line Ring Specimens and Standard Specimens. Key Engineering Materials 77:637–640. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.577-578.637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gubeljak N, Likeb A, Matvienko Y (2014) Fracture Toughness Measurement by Using Pipe-Ring Specimens. Procedia Mater Sci 3:1934–1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Likeb A, Gubeljak N, Matvienko YG (2014) Finite element estimation of the plastic ηpl factors for pipe-ring notched bend specimen using the load separation method. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 37(12):1319–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Likeb A, Gubeljak N, Matvienko Y (2014) Stress Intensity Factor and Limit Load Solutions for New Pipe-Ring Specimen with Axial Cracks. Procedia Materials Science 3:1941–1946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Likeb A, Gubeljak N (2020) The Determination of the Limit Load Solutions for the New Pipe-Ring Specimen Using Finite Element Modeling. Metals - Open Access Metall J 10(6):749. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10060749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Musrati W, Medjo B, Gubeljak N, Likeb A, Cvijović-Alagić I, Sedmak A, Rakin M (2017) Ductile fracture of pipe-ring notched bend specimens – Micromechanical analysis. Eng Fract Mech 175:247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Damjanović D, Kozak D, Matvienko Y, Gubeljak N (2017) Correlation of Pipe Ring Notched Bend (PRNB) specimen and Single Edge Notch Bend (SENB) specimen in determination of fracture toughness of pipe material. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 40(8):1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Damjanović D (2016) Doctoral disertation: Determination of fracture behaviour of the pipe-ring specimen with axial crack under the influence of residual stresses. Slavonski Brod

  32. ASTM E 837 - 08 (2008) Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method

  33. ASTM E 2860 – 12. Standard Test Method for Residual Stress Measurement by X - Ray Diffraction for Bearing Steels. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (201)

  34. Hetényi M (1950) Handbook of experimental stress analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc, London, pp 466–467

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fitzpatrick ME, Fry AT, Holdway P, Kandil FA, Shackleton J, Suominen L (2005) Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 52. In: Determination of Residual Stresses by X-ray Diffraction – Issue 2, Teddington, Middlesex, United Kingdom, NPL - National Physical Laboratory

  36. Perić M, Nižetić S, Garašić I, Gubeljak N, Vuherer T, Tonković Z (2020) Numerical calculation and experimental measurement of temperatures and welding residual stresses in a thick-walled T-joint structure. J Therm Anal Calorim 141:313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-09231-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Valiorgue F, Kermouche G, Lacaille V, Zuchiatti S, Rech J (2012) Electrolytic polishing influence on residual stresses measurements. Conference: MUGV 2012

  38. Alkaisee R, Peng RL (2014) Influence of Layer Removal Methods in Residual Stress Profiling of a Shot Peened Steel using X-ray Diffraction. Adv Mater Res 996:175–180. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.996.175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gelfi M, Bontempi E, Roberti R, Depero L (2004) X-ray diffraction Debye Ring Analysis for Stress measurement (DRAST): a new method to evaluate residual stresses. Acta Mater 52(3):583–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.041

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Milkovic M, Vuherer T, Gubeljak N (2019) Comparison of two methods for measuring residual stresses in weldments. Structural Integrity and Life 19:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nowak WJ, Ochal K, Filip R, Wierzba B (2021) The Analysis of the Residual Stress Evolution during Cycling Oxidation of the Ni-base Superalloys at High Temperature. Technical Gazette 28:540–547. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20200108155228

  42. Fontanari V, Frendo F, Bortolamedi T, Scardi P (2005) Comparison of the hole-drilling and X-ray diffraction methods for measuring the residual stresses in shot peened Al-alloys. J Strain Anal Eng Des 40(2):199–209. https://doi.org/10.1243/030932405X7791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shukla S (2020) Rapid in-line residual stress analysis from a portable two-dimensional X-ray diffractometer. Measurement 157:107672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chighizola CR, D’Elia CR, Weber D, Kirsch B, Aurich JC, Linke BS, Hill MR (2021) Intermethod Comparison and Evaluation of Measured Near Surface Residual Stress in Milled Aluminum. Exp Mech 61:1309–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00734-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Belassel M, Pineault J, Caratanasov N, Brauss M (2016) Comparison of Residual Stress Measurement Techniques and Implementation Using X-Ray Diffraction. Residual Stresses 2016 ICRS-10, Materials Research Proceedings 2:43–48. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781945291173-8

  46. Krumes D (2000) Heat treatment, Slavonski Brod: Mechanical Engineering Faculty in Slavonski Brod

  47. Rezende A, Fonseca S, Minicucci D, Fernandes F, Farina P, Mei P (2020) Residual Stress Characterization by X-Ray Diffraction and Correlation with Hardness in a Class D Railroad Wheel. J Mater Eng Perform 29:6223–6227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05097-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ariza EA, Martorano MA, de Lima NB, Tschiptschin AP (2014) Numerical Simulation with Thorough Experimental Validation to Predict the Build-up of Residual Stresses during Quenching of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels. ISIJ Int 54(6):1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.54.1396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ceglias RB, Alves JM, Botelho RA, Baeta EDSJ, dos Santos IC, de Moraes NRDC, de Oliveira RV, Diniz SB, Brandao LP (2016) Residual Stress Evaluation by X-Ray Diffraction and Hole-Drilling in an API 5L X70 Steel Pipe Bent by Hot Induction. Materials Research 19(5):1176–1179. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hammersley G, Hackel LA, Harris F (2000) Surface prestressing to improve fatigue strength of components by laser shot peening. Opt Lasers Eng 34(4–6):327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-8166(00)00083-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is funded by Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek within the UNIOS ZUP-2018 internal project funding program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering Faculty in Slavonski Brod, University of Slavonski Brod, Trg Ivane Brlić Mažuranić 2, 35 000, Slavonski Brod, Croatia

    D. Damjanović, D. Kozak, A. Milinović & J. Stojšić

Authors
  1. D. Damjanović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Kozak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Milinović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Stojšić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Damjanović.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

There are no ethical issues associated with the research reported here.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damjanović, D., Kozak, D., Milinović, A. et al. Estimation of Residual Stresses in Pipe-Ring Specimens by Incremental Hole Drilling and X-Ray Diffraction Method. Exp Tech 48, 129–139 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-023-00637-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-023-00637-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation