Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool
[Posted April 12, 2011 by corbet]
| From: |
| Avi Kivity <avi-AT-redhat.com> |
| To: |
| Pekka Enberg <penberg-AT-kernel.org> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool |
| Date: |
| Sun, 03 Apr 2011 13:11:08 +0300 |
| Message-ID: |
| <4D9847BC.9060906@redhat.com> |
| Cc: |
| linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, aarcange-AT-redhat.com,
mtosatti-AT-redhat.com, kvm-AT-vger.kernel.org, joro-AT-8bytes.org,
penberg-AT-cs.helsinki.fi, asias.hejun-AT-gmail.com, gorcunov-AT-gmail.com,
mingo-AT-elte.hu |
| Archive‑link: | |
Article |
On 04/03/2011 12:59 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Note that this is a development prototype for the time being: there's no
> >> networking support and no graphics support, amongst other missing
> >> essentials.
> >
> > Mind posting a roadmap? I would put smp support near the top. This sort of
> > thing has to be designed in, otherwise you wind up with a big lock like
> > qemu.
>
> What are the pain points with qemu at the moment?
It's an ugly gooball.
> SMP, networking, and simpler guest to host communication from shell
> are most interesting missing features for me.
If it is to be more than a toy, then Windows (really generic guest)
support, manageability, live migration, hotplug, etc. are all crucial.
> I'd also love to have
> GPU support for X and friends.
Should be easy to get by integrating spice (but that gives you a
remote-optimized display, not local).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
