In archaeology, the effort of imposing a universal function to the objects of which
images are th... more In archaeology, the effort of imposing a universal function to the objects of which images are the same, is a subject interpretative archaeology opposes. That the objects in private and the “things” in general are stereotyped, is seen equal to the things that the archaeological data want to explain. The inferences held by ignoring the discrete evidences sometimes produce wrong or inadequate consequences. Categorizing the natural disasters is also seen as one of the inadequate consequences when archaeological evidences are examined. What is fire? What do the fires occurred in archaeological settlements ask to tell archaeologists? The way of attaining the answers of these questions is to examine both discrete and concrete things together. In this paper, the fires carrying the prehistoric periods to the present will be scrutinized to examine the fires frequently seen in archaeological settlements in different points of view, by following different traces about fires.
In archaeology, the effort of imposing a universal function to the objects of which
images are th... more In archaeology, the effort of imposing a universal function to the objects of which images are the same, is a subject interpretative archaeology opposes. That the objects in private and the “things” in general are stereotyped, is seen equal to the things that the archaeological data want to explain. The inferences held by ignoring the discrete evidences sometimes produce wrong or inadequate consequences. Categorizing the natural disasters is also seen as one of the inadequate consequences when archaeological evidences are examined. What is fire? What do the fires occurred in archaeological settlements ask to tell archaeologists? The way of attaining the answers of these questions is to examine both discrete and concrete things together. In this paper, the fires carrying the prehistoric periods to the present will be scrutinized to examine the fires frequently seen in archaeological settlements in different points of view, by following different traces about fires.
Uploads
images are the same, is a subject interpretative archaeology opposes. That the objects
in private and the “things” in general are stereotyped, is seen equal to the things that
the archaeological data want to explain. The inferences held by ignoring the discrete
evidences sometimes produce wrong or inadequate consequences. Categorizing the
natural disasters is also seen as one of the inadequate consequences when archaeological
evidences are examined. What is fire? What do the fires occurred in archaeological
settlements ask to tell archaeologists? The way of attaining the answers of these questions
is to examine both discrete and concrete things together. In this paper, the fires
carrying the prehistoric periods to the present will be scrutinized to examine the fires
frequently seen in archaeological settlements in different points of view, by following
different traces about fires.
images are the same, is a subject interpretative archaeology opposes. That the objects
in private and the “things” in general are stereotyped, is seen equal to the things that
the archaeological data want to explain. The inferences held by ignoring the discrete
evidences sometimes produce wrong or inadequate consequences. Categorizing the
natural disasters is also seen as one of the inadequate consequences when archaeological
evidences are examined. What is fire? What do the fires occurred in archaeological
settlements ask to tell archaeologists? The way of attaining the answers of these questions
is to examine both discrete and concrete things together. In this paper, the fires
carrying the prehistoric periods to the present will be scrutinized to examine the fires
frequently seen in archaeological settlements in different points of view, by following
different traces about fires.