Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2023/Votes/Xaosflux: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Voted yes
Voted yes
Line 61: Line 61:
# {{Se-vote|2023|Ingenuity|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Ingenuity|Ingenuity]] ([[User talk:Ingenuity|talk]]) 14:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2023|Ingenuity|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Ingenuity|Ingenuity]] ([[User talk:Ingenuity|talk]]) 14:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2023|DaSupremo|checked=|cb=}} <span style="background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #FF95CA, #F8F8F8); padding:2px 5px; font-size:12px;">[[User:daSupremo|<span style="color:#fff">daSupremo</span>]] [[file:Diversity icon red.svg|20px|link=User talk:daSupremo]]</span> 14:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2023|DaSupremo|checked=|cb=}} <span style="background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #FF95CA, #F8F8F8); padding:2px 5px; font-size:12px;">[[User:daSupremo|<span style="color:#fff">daSupremo</span>]] [[file:Diversity icon red.svg|20px|link=User talk:daSupremo]]</span> 14:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2023|Richardkiwi|checked=|cb=}} [[User:Richardkiwi|Richardkiwi]] ([[User talk:Richardkiwi|talk]]) 14:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


==== {{sr-heading|no}} ====
==== {{sr-heading|no}} ====

Revision as of 14:37, 6 February 2023

Warning

The 2023 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Xaosflux

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en-N, es-1, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello all, I'm User:Xaosflux. My home wiki is enwiki where I've been an admin since 2006, and am a current bureaucrat and oversighter. I am a bureaucrat, oversighter, and checkuser here on the Meta-Wiki. I am a member of VRT (mostly in info-en\tech-issues). I am a global abuse-filter maintainer. You may see me on phabricator frequently, where I try to bridge the gap between sometimes vague community reports and what the developers need to work on issues. If elected, I expect I'll continue to do maintenance functions such as updating local abuse-filters, interface pages, etc - on projects that don't have communities to do such. I have a long history of dealing with bureaucratic processes and will volunteer to help in more such as the periodic admin activity review. I also have a long history of working with bot governance, and will help at bot status requests. I am generally active on-wiki every day. Thank you for your consideration, — xaosflux Talk 01:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2023/Questions#Xaosflux


Yes

  1. Hasley (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  Sgd. —Hasley 21:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ferien (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  Ferien (talk) 21:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zabe (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2023 •  Zabe (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  Giraffer (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  Seems capable for the role. --Stïnger （会話） 21:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NightWolf1223 (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  NightWolf1223 (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  7. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  We need more new stewards to check and balance questionable ones. Jusjih (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Harej (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  Harej (talk) 21:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Lomrjyo (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  --llomrjyo (talk • contribs • CA • en) 21:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  11. 1989 (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  1989 (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2023 •  Joseywales1961 (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  Ghilt (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  Anatoliy (talk) 22:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2023 •  100% yes. Full support. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 22:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Ivanbetanco43 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2023 •  Ivanbetanco43 (talk) 22:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  Haven't always agreed with their positions but is well thought out and conscientious and would make a good addition. Rschen7754 22:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  18. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  ToBeFree (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  Daniuu (talk) 22:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Rosalina474418 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  Princess Rosalina Q 456345 23:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Syunsyunminmin (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 23:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Terasail (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  Terasail[✉️] 23:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  23. MusikAnimal (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  Obvious support :) Xaosflux could and should have had this role years ago. — MusikAnimal talk 23:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  24. TheresNoTime (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 23:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  Barkeep49 (talk) 23:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Lookruk (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  I trust this user the most in my heart. --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 23:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  27. 94rain (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  94rain Talk 01:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hehua (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2023 •  Hehua (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  29. EN-Jungwon (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2023 •  -- EN-Jungwon 01:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  30. SBassett (WMF) (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2023 •  SBassett (WMF) (talk) 02:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Ekminarin (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2023 •  Minarin (talk) 03:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Red-tailed hawk (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2023 •  Thank you for your faithful service to the community. I look forward to seeing you succeed in this new role. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Paine Ellsworth (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2023 •  P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'er there 04:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
       ドラみそ (Not eligible, checked by Mtarch11) •  ドラみそ (talk) 05:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AlPaD (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2023 •  AlPaD (talk) 05:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Ymblanter (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2023 •  Generally a reasonable person --Ymblanter (talk) 05:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Arado Ar 196 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2023 •  Arado Ar 196 (talk) 05:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Lord Roem (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2023 •  Lord Roem (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  38. HouseBlaster (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  Completely. HouseBlaster (talk) 07:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  39. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  HakanIST (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  This is stewardship, not a global rollback/sysop application. It's clear that this person is somewhat technical-oriented, which I don't see a problem with. The only thing to note is that your answer to my "stretch" question as unexpected; not only did you not catch the hint for the first part, it was not the intention that you could freely choose X. Leaderboard (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  41. M4tinbeigi (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  Rick Sanchez (talk) 07:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Tumbuka Arch (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  Definitely! Excellent candidate and they deserve this role! Tumbuka Arch★★★ 07:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2023 •  – Ajraddatz (talk) 08:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  44. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 08:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2023 •  Johannnes89 (talk) 08:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Ahm masum (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2023 •  MASUM THE GREAT (talk) 09:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Thingofme (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2023 •  Good user and capable for the role. Thingofme (talk) 10:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Worm That Turned (Eligible, checked by Taavi)2023 •  There are few members of en.wp that I would recommend for Steward. Xaosflux is one. WormTT 10:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2023 •  I think the answer to Sotiale question can be better but I still think they will be a net positive if elected as a steward. Xaosflux is very responsive to OS requests on meta and cordial in their interactions with other users here. I am sure they will lean the rope fast and thanks for running. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Minilammas (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2023 •  --Minilammas (talk) 11:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Hamid Hassani (Eligible, checked by SHB2000)2023 •  -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 12:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Fehufanga (Eligible, checked by Ferien)2023 •  --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 12:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  Despite low xwiki activity this year, he could be capable for stewardship with his edits and rights on Meta. --Uncitoyentalk 13:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Lemonaka (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2023 •  Lemonaka (talk) 13:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  55. TarPas (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2023 •  + TarPas (talk) 13:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ingenuity (Verification pending) •  Ingenuity (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  57. DaSupremo (Verification pending) •  daSupremo 14:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Richardkiwi (Verification pending) •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No

  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  I'm not convinced. For example I'm not impressed with the answer to Sotiale's question. MF-W 21:06, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. BuddhikaW88 (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2023 •  BuddhikaW88 (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mapatxea (Eligible, checked by Taavi)2023 •  Mapatxea (talk) 10:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Taavi)2023 •  Not enough cross-wiki activity for me. IWI (talk) 10:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  2. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by Zabe)2023 •  Low x-wiki, may revisit this. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     22:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  on basis that xaosflux is not active x-wiki. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by Fehufanga)2023 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MdsShakil (Eligible, checked by Mtarch11)2023 •  Low in xwiki —MdsShakil (talk) 02:48, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mtarch11 (Eligible, checked by Sdrqaz)2023 •  Mtarch11 (talk) 03:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SHB2000 (Eligible, checked by MdsShakil)2023 •  Their x-wiki activity is too low for me to support. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 05:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tommes (Eligible, checked by Johannnes89)2023 •  --Tommes (talk) 07:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2023/Votes/Xaosflux&oldid=24499252"