Richard Menary
I am Professor and Head of the Department of Philosophy at Macquarie University Sydney. Between 2014 and 2018 I was an ARC Future Fellow. I read for a BA in philosophy at the University of Ulster, an MSc in Cognitive Science at the University of Birmingham and then a PhD in philosophy at King's College London. I have taught philosophy at the University of Kent, Birkbeck College Faculty of Continuing Education and as a Senior Lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire and then at the University of Wollongong.
My Research interests include:
Philosophy of Mind – especially narrative approaches to the self
Philosophy of Cognitive Science – especially embodied and extended cognition
Pragmatism - especially C.S. Peirce
Wittgenstein
Aesthetics
Virtue theory as it applies to both ethical and cognitive aspects of the individual.
I can supervise PhD theses in these areas.
My main current research interest concerns extended mind style arguments, my own take on which I call cognitive integration. According to which the real pay-off from extended mind style arguments is not a new form of externalism in the philosophy of mind, but rather a view in which the ‘internal’ and ‘external’ aspects of cognition are integrated into a whole. I argue for this thesis in my book Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded.
I was the lead investigator for the Australian Research Council ‘Embodied Virtues and Expertise’ Discovery project (2010-2013) awarded $293,000. The research team includes: Prof. Shaun Gallagher, Prof. Daniel Hutto, Prof. Christopher Winch, Dr. David Simpson.
My Research interests include:
Philosophy of Mind – especially narrative approaches to the self
Philosophy of Cognitive Science – especially embodied and extended cognition
Pragmatism - especially C.S. Peirce
Wittgenstein
Aesthetics
Virtue theory as it applies to both ethical and cognitive aspects of the individual.
I can supervise PhD theses in these areas.
My main current research interest concerns extended mind style arguments, my own take on which I call cognitive integration. According to which the real pay-off from extended mind style arguments is not a new form of externalism in the philosophy of mind, but rather a view in which the ‘internal’ and ‘external’ aspects of cognition are integrated into a whole. I argue for this thesis in my book Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded.
I was the lead investigator for the Australian Research Council ‘Embodied Virtues and Expertise’ Discovery project (2010-2013) awarded $293,000. The research team includes: Prof. Shaun Gallagher, Prof. Daniel Hutto, Prof. Christopher Winch, Dr. David Simpson.
less
InterestsView All (54)
Uploads
Books by Richard Menary
The contributors first discuss (and answer) objections raised to Clark and Chalmers’s thesis. Andy Clark himself responds to critics in a paper that uses the movie Memento’s amnesia-aiding notes and tattoos to illustrate the workings of the extended mind. Contributors then consider the different directions in which the extended mind project might be taken, including the need for an approach that focuses on cognitive activity and practice.
Contributors
Fred Adams, Ken Aizawa, David Chalmers, Andy Clark, Stephen Cowley, Susan Hurley, James Ladyman, Richard Menary, John Preston, Don Ross, Mark Rowlands, Robert D. Rupert, David Spurrett, John Sutton, Michael Wheeler, Rob A. Wilson
Richard Menary is a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Wollongong. He is the author of Cognitive Integration and the Philosophy of Cognition.
Papers by Richard Menary
If cognitive systems are hybrid, composed of heterogeneous components spread out over brain, body and environment, then how are they integrated into coherent functioning systems? Rather than take a synchronic view of integration, this chapter will investigate the evolutionary history of integrated systems and ask: how did such systems evolve? The answer lies in the unique evolutionary history of humans and the important roles of niche construction and cultural inheritance in driving the evolution of hybrid and integrated cognitive systems.
Citation details: Menary 2016 Pragmatism and the Pragmatic Turn in Engel, A. K., K. J. Friston, and D. Kragic, eds. 2016. The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. Strüngmann Forum Reports, vol. 18. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.
constrains what the brain can learn. It is argued that the neural niche co-evolves with the environmental niche in a way that does not undermine the core ideas of neuronal recycling, but which is quite different from the models of cognitive and cultural evolution
provided by evolutionary psychology and epidemiology. Dehaene contrasts neuronal recycling with a naïve model of the brain as a general learning device that is unconstrained in what it can learn. Consequently a tension develops in Dehaene’s account of the role of plasticity in the acquisition of language. It is argued that the functional and structural changes in the brain that Dehaene documents in great detail are driven by learning and that this learning-driven plasticity does not commit us to a naïve model of the brain.
The contributors first discuss (and answer) objections raised to Clark and Chalmers’s thesis. Andy Clark himself responds to critics in a paper that uses the movie Memento’s amnesia-aiding notes and tattoos to illustrate the workings of the extended mind. Contributors then consider the different directions in which the extended mind project might be taken, including the need for an approach that focuses on cognitive activity and practice.
Contributors
Fred Adams, Ken Aizawa, David Chalmers, Andy Clark, Stephen Cowley, Susan Hurley, James Ladyman, Richard Menary, John Preston, Don Ross, Mark Rowlands, Robert D. Rupert, David Spurrett, John Sutton, Michael Wheeler, Rob A. Wilson
Richard Menary is a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Wollongong. He is the author of Cognitive Integration and the Philosophy of Cognition.
If cognitive systems are hybrid, composed of heterogeneous components spread out over brain, body and environment, then how are they integrated into coherent functioning systems? Rather than take a synchronic view of integration, this chapter will investigate the evolutionary history of integrated systems and ask: how did such systems evolve? The answer lies in the unique evolutionary history of humans and the important roles of niche construction and cultural inheritance in driving the evolution of hybrid and integrated cognitive systems.
Citation details: Menary 2016 Pragmatism and the Pragmatic Turn in Engel, A. K., K. J. Friston, and D. Kragic, eds. 2016. The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. Strüngmann Forum Reports, vol. 18. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.
constrains what the brain can learn. It is argued that the neural niche co-evolves with the environmental niche in a way that does not undermine the core ideas of neuronal recycling, but which is quite different from the models of cognitive and cultural evolution
provided by evolutionary psychology and epidemiology. Dehaene contrasts neuronal recycling with a naïve model of the brain as a general learning device that is unconstrained in what it can learn. Consequently a tension develops in Dehaene’s account of the role of plasticity in the acquisition of language. It is argued that the functional and structural changes in the brain that Dehaene documents in great detail are driven by learning and that this learning-driven plasticity does not commit us to a naïve model of the brain.