We should really decommission the Beta Cluster Wikifunctions at this point. Sorry for the noise.

In T219551#9524567, @Esanders wrote:

In T264183#9374873, @Esanders wrote:

I've moved 11 of the remaining 37 pages, but the other 26 will require someone with more rights across all wikis.

In T219551#8541799, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

Should we ask the stewards to do this?

Yes please.

In T377337#10297019, @egardner wrote:

Thanks @gengh for that patch. Looks like this addresses the immediate issue.

I think that it is still worth exploring changes to how we limit the ability of items in page content to set their own z-indexes, but that can be handled separately.

Some of them are matrix-creations that we never run in practice.

Well, it's too late now, but I would not have gotten rid of all the old tags, but instead the old branches and the non-latest old tags (so REL1_38 and 1.38.* except 1.38.7), as that's what people will rely upon. :-(

As one of the principal deciders behind why so much of our library-like FE code is MIT, including VE/OOjs/OOUI/etc., I was a bit surprised when WVUI decided to depart from what I thought was the otherwise-agreed standard.

In T374318#10350479, @Feeglgeef wrote:

My bot (that runs the featured tool from the newsletter) that continuously tries to locally update every Z2 all the time, and has sent (by my really really rough estimate) 100,000 requests to Wikifunctions in the past week,

If we're waiting longer before doing this, that's deferred not declined, surely?

In T380807#10418781, @akosiaris wrote:

In T380807#10413489, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

In T380807#10405269, @akosiaris wrote:

What are the support requirements for such an image ? I 'll ask the team, but I have my doubts SRE has built any kind of significant enough knowledge to support Rust at this point in time. And it would arguably be confusing to publish such an image if we can not provide support for it.

None expected (beyond being part of the regular base-image-gets-rebuilt-every-Monday system). We intend to support this image inside the Abstract team (but defer to SRE if you want to take it over more officially, of course).

If the Abstract team intends to support that image, why not provide it also in the first place? That should avoid wrongfully set expectations to the wider org that SRE maintains that image (which at this point in time doesn't yet have the experience to do so).

We should also backport the use into older, active branches of MW-core.

In T381972#10416975, @Feeglgeef wrote:

In T381972#10416899, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

I've made the edit to fix the Object. https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z10121 now works again.

Now I see why you think I should "Never do that, ever" :) Sorry about this.

I've made the edit to fix the Object. https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z10121 now works again.