User Details
- User Since
- Apr 24 2017, 6:25 PM (388 w, 4 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- Julle [ Global Accounts ]
Aug 24 2021
Aug 9 2021
Jan 21 2021
Re-assigning. In reality, I suppose this was always a volunteer project.
Jan 18 2021
At least the audio part! I wasn't sure about the international CC-BY compatibility of my visuals.
Dec 19 2020
Nov 23 2020
Thanks!
Oct 5 2020
Regarding finding short articles, Swedish Wikipedia isn't very keen on using the stub template; a few weeks ago there was even a discussion on the Village Pump about getting rid of it:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bybrunnen&oldid=48322084#Stubb_och_noter
Sep 25 2020
Yes, Wikipedia:Fikarummet/Frågor is the correct link. The other links are also good. Maybe this might work as link text:
Sep 12 2020
@Trizek-WMF Probably, if the one yet not fully translated page is the only thing we have to finish.
Sep 1 2020
There's an ongoing discussion here:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipediadiskussion:Faddrar#Ny_funktion_f%C3%B6r_att_koppla_ihop_nyb%C3%B6rjare_med_faddrar
Aug 29 2020
I boldly made a couple of minor changes to the aliases in the task description. Special:Välkomstenkät is better than Special:VälkomstEnkät. Camel case makes some sort of sense in English, where it's two words. In Swedish, it's actually one word, so there's not reason to capitalise the second root morpheme. But we generally tend to avoid camel case in our translated Special: aliases (Special:Gamla sidor, not Special:GamlaSidor and so on), which is in line with our own style guide, so I'd also recommend Special:Välj nybörjare rather than Special:VäljNybörjare.
May 15 2020
Being an editor and this being late enough to be in my spare time, I've simply added it since it fixes a problem that ought to be fixed.
Feb 5 2020
I went ahead and fixed it.
Nov 29 2019
Sure, at some point in the coming, uh, decades.
Aug 19 2018
To clarify, the most important difference in process is that we have nothing like the English Wikipedia WikiProject templates and thus not their importance/quality ratings. We have a GA/FA process reasonably similar to English Wikipedia, with the addition of the recommended articles (which, as said, can be added by anyone).