User Details
- User Since
- Nov 16 2014, 1:34 PM (510 w, 1 d)
- Availability
- Available
- IRC Nick
- xqt
- LDAP User
- Xqt
- MediaWiki User
- Xqt [ Global Accounts ]
Yesterday
Sun, Aug 25
Reopened for lint tests and fasttest
Thu, Aug 22
Stalled until issue is solved upstream
Mon, Aug 19
I am not familiar with pipx. Currently pywikibot-scripts does not have any requirements for tests but pywikibot will be added to requirement list later with the final release. The pwb.exe is a console entry point which calls a wrapper script to invoke any script in predefined script folders, and it is already part of the pywikibot framework. pywikibot-scripts installs a module entry point like in flake8 or other packages, so that the wrapper can use it as a scripts folder path. Therefore the pwb.exe couldn't be part of the pywikibot-scripts; other script libraries are also conceivable to use the entry-point mechanism. Installing pywikibot` and pywikibot-scripts locally via pip install ... works for me as expected. Maybe you could use venv and take pip as installer.
Sun, Aug 18
Here is a prerelease package for pywikibot-scripts and pywikibot. Both have the version 9.4.0. I propose to sync the pywikibot-scripts version vith its framework. Are there other suggestions? pywikibot-scripts is only available as wheel distribution, not tarball. I didn't found a way to create it yet.
Fri, Aug 16
Thu, Aug 15
\o/
@Xover: thank you for this valuable comment. Distributing the script package is not trivial and was not able to implement in a good way before Python 3.7. I am still working on this task from time to time but there are other issues which might be more important. Anyway there is a way to get the whole package of Pywkibot together with their scripts via the nighly dump at https://pywikibot.org. Does this help in mean time?
Wed, Aug 14
Mon, Aug 12
Sun, Aug 11
Sat, Aug 10
Fri, Aug 9
I made a patch in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/pywikibot/core/+/1061035
What is your local wiki you started this script? What are the delinker settings in the scripts.ini file?
Thu, Aug 8
Wed, Aug 7
@hashar: thank you much
Tue, Aug 6
Sat, Aug 3
The page was The Walt Disney Company CIS.
Thu, Aug 1
Mon, Jul 29
The reason is that promt flag of BasePage.delete() is set to verify the deletion and input_choice gives 'n' then.
Sun, Jul 28
The problem there is that fixes just uses regex.sub while cosmetic changes uses complex methods and functions
Jul 27 2024
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki. It was disabled on most wikis, (see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Structured_Discussions/Wikis).
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki. It was disabled on most wikis, (see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Structured_Discussions/Wikis). Therefore I remove Pywikibot from Tags (i.e. declining further activities for it on pwb side)
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki. It was disabled on most wikis, (see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Structured_Discussions/Wikis). As this is marked as external by the Growth-Team, I decline this request.
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki. It was disabled on most wikis, (see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Structured_Discussions/Wikis). Therefore I remove Pywikibot from Tags (i.e. declining further activities for it on pwb side)
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki. It was disabled on most wikis, (see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Structured_Discussions/Wikis) and is too expensive to maintain on Pywikibot side then for only a couple of users. Therefore decline this request. If someone is willing and able to claim this task, please reopen it and make your code proposal.
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki
subtasks are resolved or declined
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years, should no longer be used and and was disabled on test-wiki
T371112: Structured Discussion is not maintained for years and was disabled on test-wiki
Als subtasks are done or declined
StructuredDiscussion aka Flow is no longer maintained, see T371180
T371112: Structured Discussion was disabled on test-wiki
Structured Discussion was disabled on testwiki (T371112)
Structured Discussion was disabled on testwiki (T371112)
Is such a bot still required? Recently posts are signed automatically by DiscussionTools in mw 1.43+. In this case this request can be closed.