Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Medical Case Reports
. 2025 Jan 9;19:10. doi: 10.1186/s13256-024-05022-z

A novel treatment strategy with hyperbaric oxygen of chronic osteomyelitis and pseudoarthrosis in a child with congenital hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 4 congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis syndrome: a case report

Anders Kjellberg 1,2,, Rebecca Gustafsson 3, Pavel Antonsson 3,4, Henrik Hedelin 3,4
PMCID: PMC11720336  PMID: 39789590

Abstract

Background

Congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis is a rare but devastating hereditary disease. Congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis is caused by a mutation in the neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1 gene (NRTK1). The condition is characterized by multiple injuries, recurrent infections, and mental retardation.

Case presentation

A 7-year-old Kurdish female patient, with a known case of congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis, presented with a left tibial fracture, complicated by incorrect healing, osteomyelitis, and pseudoarthrosis spanning over a number of years. The osteomyelitis and pseudoarthrosis eventually healed after treatment with a combination of a long course of antibiotics, CERAMENT with gentamicin, and 40 sessions of hyperbaric oxygen treatment at 2.4 bar, 113 minutes with two air breaks. This is the first reported case of using hyperbaric oxygen treatment in children with congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis. We discuss potential mechanistic explanations of the association between healing and hyperbaric oxygen treatment.

Conclusion

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment may be considered in other cases of complicated infections or treatment-resistant pseudoarthrosis in patients with this rare disease.

Keywords: Case report, CIPA, HSAN IV, HBOT, Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, Orthopedics

Introduction

Congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA), also known as hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 4 (HSAN IV), is a very rare disease, and the exact prevalence is unknown [1]. CIPA is an autosomal recessive hereditary disorder defined by the inability to feel pain and anhidrosis (inability to sweat). An incidence of 1 in 25,000 births has been suggested, with most reports originating from China, Japan, and the Middle East [2]. The condition is characterized by multiple injuries, recurrent infections, mental retardation, and self-mutilating behavior [3].

Clinically, children with CIPA are plagued by recurrent idiopathic osteomyelitis or septic arthritis, as well as frequent fractures. The clinical signs of infection are atypical and often not present. High fevers are common with or without concurrent infection [4]. Inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and white blood cells are also unreliable and are often within the normal range despite deep infection and can be elevated without any identifiable source of infection [5]. As opposed to normal pediatric fractures, which heal quickly, fractures in children with CIPA are more resistant to healing, often forming hypertrophic pseudoarthrosis (non-union). It is not uncommon that a fracture that would normally heal within 3 weeks may take half a year to heal in a child with CIPA, if it heals at all. This is further complicated by the fact that surgical implants carry a very high risk of infection [5]. The frequent fractures and the lack of proper healing is likely owing to the lack of nociceptive fibers in the bone tissue and the trophic role they play in healing [6, 7]. The bone and soft tissue infections in CIPA are commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus but resistance to antibiotics is a common problem, and antibiotics may be less effective in this group of patients [8].

CIPA is caused by a mutation in the neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1 gene (NRTK1, also known as TRKA) located on chromosome 1 (1q21-q22) [9]. NRTK1 encodes for tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA), a tyrosine kinase receptor for nerve growth factor beta (NGFβ), the receptor auto-phosphorylates in response to NGFβ and induces downstream pathways of intracellular signaling [10]. However, a dysfunctional TrkA is not the full explanation for the multifaceted symptomatology in HSAN IV, as different mutations will result in variations in phenotypes [11]. NGFβ-TrkA signaling has a wide array of downstream intracellular effects, including a link to endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) and regulation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) in neuronal cell lines [12]. NRTK1 also has an important function in regulating the immune system, which may explain the dysregulated immune response and inability to resolve infections in children suffering from CIPA [13, 14].

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) has been used for more than 70 years to treat severe infections [15]. For refractory osteomyelitis, 2.0–3.0 bar for 90–120 minutes is recommended, and 20–40 sessions are typically needed for a sustained effect [16]. Recent preclinical research has shown that HBOT augments bacteriostatic antibiotics in biofilm-forming infections [1720]. Recent advances in the understanding of the host–pathogen interaction suggest that HBOT has a systemic effect on the intracellular environment in immune cells, including regulation of ER stress and the UPR, which may be beneficial in both bacterial and viral infections [21, 22].

CIPA syndrome is a serious congenital disorder with markedly lowered life expectancy and decreased quality of life, largely owing to repeat infections of bones and joints. These infections are commonly difficult to treat with only antibiotics. This case report aims to present an adjunctive treatment option for refractory infections and osteosynthesis to support healing, and discuss mechanisms of specific interest for CIPA syndrome.

Case presentation

Initial presentation and deformity

A 7-year-old girl of Kurdish ethnicity, with no previous family history of genetic disorders, was diagnosed with HSAN IV CIPA at the age of 5 years. The diagnosis was originally suspected as the child did not notice multiple minor injuries. She was born and raised in Sweden within a well-functioning family, developed intellectually normally until the age of 6 years, and investigation revealed no other medical or dental history related to any other illness. She presented in March 2016 to the orthopedic emergency department (ED) with a left proximal tibial Salter-Harris II fracture with minimal displacement. She had previously been treated for soft tissue infections and metatarsal fractures, and had continuous clindamycin 150 mg three times daily (TID) per oral prophylaxis. On admission, her general appearance was normal, she was afebrile with normal pulse, blood pressure, and respiratory rate. The knee and lower leg were swollen. She showed some discomfort on palpation but was unable to stand. The parents were not aware of any specific trauma as the cause for the fracture. Blood tests, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) count, were normal.

Initial cast treatment of the left tibia fracture resulted in a 20° varus deformity of the tibia after 1 week, likely owing to the patient’s inability to restrict weight bearing.

To avoid further displacement, closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation were attempted. However, 3 weeks after surgery the patient was hospitalized again owing to septic osteomyelitis of the fracture and septic arthritis in the left knee. The pins were subsequently removed, the arthritis drained, and intravenous antibiotics treatment was commenced (Fig. 1A). Along with renewed cast immobilization (and subsequent orthosis) the fracture eventually healed after 1 year. However, the healed fracture did result in a medial slope in the tibial physis, a varus deformity of 30°, and leg length discrepancy (Fig. 1B). Owing to this deformity, the patient had difficulty walking and was mostly confined to a wheelchair.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Initial fracture 2016–2017. June 2016, 3 months after the initial fracture. The pins have been removed owing to septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. The fracture remains unstable with marked bone destruction (A); 1 year after the initial injury the fracture and osteomyelitis had healed but resulted in a marked tibial slope with gradually increasing varus deformity and leg length discrepancy. A medial physeal bony bridge was noted (B)

Reconstructive ambitions

Despite the well-known risk of complications, a multidisciplinary decision was made to attempt surgical correction of the deformity in the hope of allowing the patient to remain ambulatory. In April 2019, the patient underwent a reconstruction of the left medial femur condyle with a chevron osteotomy and a temporary lateral physiodesis. The combined surgery slowed the progression of varus deformity, but it did not sufficiently improve the patient’s persistent deformity and ability to walk. In August 2022, a second surgical correction with a high tibial osteotomy was performed. The osteotomy was stabilized with a total of four percutaneous pins (Fig. 2A). A wound swab on 1 September showed mixed Gram-negative flora susceptible to clindamycin. A follow-up in October 2022 revealed no signs of healing despite the osteotomy remaining in place. In November 2022 a superficial pin infection was noted, and there were still no signs of healing on the radiographs.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Pseudoarthrosis 2022. Almost 8 years after the initial fracture, in August 2022, a surgical correction with a tibial osteotomy was performed. The osteotomy was stabilized with a total of four percutaneous pins (A). The pins, in combination with a chevron osteotomy, were chosen with the intention of increasing stability and decreasing the risk of implant infection. Despite this a pseudoarthrosis developed that was eventually infected. In an ambition to retain stability, a titanium elastic nail was inserted in January 2023 (B)

Residual pseudoarthrosis and osteomyelitis

In January 2023, the pins were removed in the operating room, but the osteotomy remained unstable and was stabilized with an intramedullary titanium elastic nail (Fig. 2B), and 2 weeks later the patient presented again at the ED with a suspected osteomyelitis and wound infection around the nail entry point. A wound swab on 31 January showed Gram-negative mix, susceptible to clindamycin. Cefotaxime 2 g three times a day intravenously, clindamycin 600 mg three times a day intravenously, and vancomycin 1.24 g three times a day intravenously was initiated for 7 days followed by continued clindamycin prophylaxis orally. In February 2023, radiographs confirmed a chronic pseudoarthrosis and no signs of healing of the osteomyelitis.

In an attempt to promote healing, the patient underwent an extraction of the nail, open debridement, and implantation of CERAMENT® V with vancomycin (Bonesupport AB, Lund, Sweden) in March 2023 (Fig. 3). Tissue samples from the debridement on 27 March revealed growth of Corynebacterium species susceptible to linezolid, therefore, linezolid 600 mg twice daily intravenously was added to the treatment regimen and continued for 4 weeks. A wound swab on 6 April was negative.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Post-surgery with CERAMEMT® V 2023. X-ray post-surgery in March 2023, with extensive debridement and implantation of CERAMENT® V with vancomycin

HBOT

Despite the previous surgical and antibacterial treatment, a follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan in July 2023 showed limited signs of bony healing, and the tibia was not stable to manual manipulation. A multidisciplinary decision was made to attempt HBOT. The treatment was commenced in July 2023. HBOT treatment was undertaken in July–August 2023 with 40 treatments, 5 days a week, 100% oxygen at 2.4 bar, 113 minutes with two air breaks in a multiplace chamber.

SPECT/CT and MRI

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lower limbs were performed before and after the HBOT, approximately 5 months apart.

Outcome

In October 2023, imaging with SPECT/CT and MRI confirmed a completely healed osteotomy and no signs of osteomyelitis. The SPECT/CT revealed slightly decreased perfusion in the affected tibia after HBOT, which can be expected with a healed infection (Fig. 4). The patient was allowed to weight-bear with support. At 1-year follow-up, in January 2024, the patient showed no clinical signs of infection and was able to walk short distances indoors with support. The alignment obtained by the corrective osteotomy had been maintained.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Healed fracture in October 2023. Perfusion scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography of the lower extremities performed 15 minutes after intravenous injection of (99mTc)-tetrofosmin. The sensitivity factor of the camera detector was derived using phantom measurements to semi-quantify the perfusion. The fracture area was segmented on the basis of low-dose computed tomography images, and the proportion of a given activity in an area was calculated. Before the treatment, 0.13% of given activity was measured per 100 mL volume in the fracture area (A). After treatment, perfusion has decreased in both visual assessment and semi-quantification, which measured 0.09% of given activity per 100 mL volume (B). The magnetic resonance imaging verified bony union and no signs of infection, represented by a coronary short-tau inversion recovery sequence (C)

Discussion

We present the case of a child with CIPA syndrome who presented with a tibia fracture that was complicated by poor, incorrect healing and subsequent osteomyelitis as a complication to reconstructive surgery. We highlight the challenges of treating fractures in these patients that are often treated conservatively owing to the known risks of complications. Specific treatment options are limited, with poor healing, refractory infections, and antibiotic resistance being common problems. This complicated fracture with deep infection was successfully treated with a combination of reconstructive surgery, CERAMENT®V and HBOT. HBOT is an established adjuvant treatment for refractory osteomyelitis, and we discuss mechanisms specifically related to patients with CIPA and how it may be beneficial as an adjuvant treatment option when surgery is deemed necessary.

Interpretation of treatment and results

In this case, with a persistent pseudoarthrosis that was recurrently infected, multiple treatment modalities were used in conjunction. It can thus not be known whether the HBOT treatment was the main factor for healing. The surgery, the CERAMENT®V, and the antibiotic regimen could be equally or more important. The HBOT treatment did, however, correlate in time with healing (Fig. 5). The HBOT treatment was well tolerated by the child and no adverse effects were noted.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Case timeline. XR X-ray, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, CT scan computed tomography scan, SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography, vanco vancomycin, HBOT hyperbaric oxygen treatment, + positive culture, N negative culture

Physiological and pharmacological aspects of HBOT for patients with CIPA

The decision to attempt HBOT was based on the established benefits for osteomyelitis in general, and the theoretical benefits for CIPA specifically. HBOT has a number of theoretical positive effects on patients with CIPA. HBOT is an established adjuvant treatment in both acute and chronic infections, with distinct effects on the innate immune system [24, 25]. Dysfunction and apoptosis in nerve cells can explain some of the features involved in the syndrome but the complex interplay between the nervous system, stem cell-activation, and immune response is far from understood [26]. However, it has been shown that communication between sensory nerves and osteoblasts through NGFβ–TrkA signaling is essential for load-induced bone formation in mice [27], and inhibition of NGFβ-TrkA signaling negatively regulates aberrant stem cell differentiation, and causes a delay in cartilage and bone formation [28]. HBOT has been shown to be effective for bone healing in a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) with patients suffering from femoral head necrosis (FHN) [29]. A suggested mechanism, derived from the RCT, is the activation of osteoclasts through osteoprotegerin (OPG), the receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL), and the receptor activator of NF-kB (RANK) systems [30]. NGFβ–TrkA signaling is crucial for macrophage signaling and neutrophil migration, which may explain the increased susceptibility to S. aureus infections in patients with CIPA [31, 32]. HBOT has also been shown to affect various parts of the integrated stress response (ISR), including the unfolded protein response (UPR) and the DNA damage response (DDR) [33, 34]. Since TrkA has such a wide array of intracellular functions in various cells, we speculate that an unspecific modulator of ISR may serve as a bypass mechanism of NGFβ that has a positive effect on the innate immune function and bone formation. NGF and HBOT have also been shown to improve learning, memory ability, and sensory motor function in neonatal rats after hypoxic ischemic brain damage [35]. HBOT has also been shown to reduce neuroinflammation and protect mitochondrial function, consequently preventing neuronal apoptosis in a murine model [36]. It would therefore be highly interesting to test HBOT in an animal model with a TrkA mutation to explore whether there is also a possible effect on neuronal function that could prevent or delay the inevitable complications of this extremely rare but devastating hereditary disease.

Imaging with SPECT/CT and MRI in patients with CIPA

(99mTc)-tetrofosmin is a radiopharmaceutical, commonly used for mapping myocardial perfusion, but the method can also be used to image osteomyelitis in extremities [37]. SPECT/CT increases the accuracy in the diagnose of osteomyelitis compared with planar SPECT [38]. MRI is useful in the diagnosis and follow-up of osteomyelitis because of its high sensitivity and availability. To increase the specificity for osteomyelitis, fluid-sensitive sequences including short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences are particularly useful. In STIR sequences, the signal from fat is decreased, increasing the visibility of inflammatory changes and fluid collections [39].

Conclusion

CIPA is an extremely rare syndrome in which patients are subjected to repeated injuries as well as severe infections that may be fatal. In this case, HBOT was associated with a favorable outcome, and HBOT may be considered as an alternative treatment in patients with treatment-resistant pseudoarthrosis.

Acknowledgements

We thank the patient and the parents for the opportunity to publish this case report.

Abbreviations

CIPA

Congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis

CT

Computed tomography

HBOT

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment

HSAN IV

Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 4

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

NRTK1

Neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1

SPECT

Single-photon emission computed tomography

TrkA

Tropomyosin receptor kinase A

Author contributions

Conceptualization, HH and AK; methodology, AK and HH; investigation, HH, RG, and PA; resources, HH and PA; writing—original draft preparation, AK; writing—review and editing, AK, HH, and RG; visualization, AK and PA; supervision, HH; project administration, HH and AK; and funding acquisition, HH. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. AK is the corresponding author for this work and attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. HH declares funding by a grant from Stiftelsen Promobilia for this publication.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available owing to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Patient/parent consent for data sharing is conditioned and new consent is required.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Sahlgrenska University Hospital Ethical Board reviewed and approved the project, given written informed consent by the parents and child.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. The child was also orally informed with separate information, adjusted for the age of the child. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no potential competing interests and no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Axelrod FB, Gold-von SG. Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies: types II, III, and IV. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rodriguez-Blanque R, Nielsen LM, Piqueras-Sola B, Sanchez-Garcia JC, Cortes-Martin C, Reinoso-Cobo A, et al. A systematic review of congenital insensitivity to pain, a rare disease. J Pers Med. 2024. 10.3390/jpm14060570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Indo Y. Molecular basis of congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA): mutations and polymorphisms in TRKA (NTRK1) gene encoding the receptor tyrosine kinase for nerve growth factor. Hum Mutat. 2001;18(6):462–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li N, Guo S, Wang Q, Duan G, Sun J, Liu Y, et al. Heterogeneity of clinical features and mutation analysis of NTRK1 in Han Chinese patients with congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis. J Pain Res. 2019;12:453–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Perez-Lopez LM, Cabrera-Gonzalez M, Gutierrez-de la Iglesia D, Ricart S, Knorr-Gimenez G. Update review and clinical presentation in congenital insensitivity to pain and Anhidrosis. Case Rep Pediatr. 2015;2015:589852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Derwin KA, Glover RA, Wojtys EM. Nociceptive role of substance-P in the knee joint of a patient with congenital insensitivity to pain. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(2):258–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hill EL, Elde R. Distribution of CGRP-, VIP-, D beta H-, SP-, and NPY-immunoreactive nerves in the periosteum of the rat. Cell Tissue Res. 1991;264(3):469–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fruchtman Y, Perry ZH, Levy J. Morbidity characteristics of patients with congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA). J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2013;26(3–4):325–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Indo Y. Genetics of congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA) or hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type IV. Clinical, biological and molecular aspects of mutations in TRKA(NTRK1) gene encoding the receptor tyrosine kinase for nerve growth factor. Clin Auton Res. 2002;12(Suppl 1):I20-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Indo Y. Nerve growth factor, interoception, and sympathetic neuron: lesson from congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis. Auton Neurosci. 2009;147(1–2):3–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shaikh SS, Chen YC, Halsall SA, Nahorski MS, Omoto K, Young GT, et al. A comprehensive functional analysis of NTRK1 missense mutations causing hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type IV (HSAN IV). Hum Mutat. 2017;38(1):55–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiao B, Zhang M, Zhang C, Cao X, Liu B, Li N, et al. Transcriptomics reveals the effects of NTRK1 on endoplasmic reticulum stress response-associated genes in human neuronal cell lines. PeerJ. 2023;11: e15219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Melamed I, Levy J, Parvari R, Gelfand EW. A novel lymphocyte signaling defect: trk A mutation in the syndrome of congenital insensitivity to pain and anhidrosis (CIPA). J Clin Immunol. 2004;24(4):441–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rochman M, Kartashov AV, Caldwell JM, Collins MH, Stucke EM, Kc K, et al. Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 1 is a direct transcriptional and epigenetic target of IL-13 involved in allergic inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8(4):785–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brummelkamp WH, Boerema I, Hoogendyk L. Treatment of clostridial infections with hyperbaric oxygen drenching. A report on 26 cases. Lancet. 1963;1(7275):235–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Savvidou OD, Kaspiris A, Bolia IK, Chloros GD, Goumenos SD, Papagelopoulos PJ, et al. Effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the management of chronic osteomyelitis: a systematic review of the literature. Orthopedics. 2018;41(4):193–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Laulund AS, Schwartz FA, Christophersen L, Kolpen M, Ostrup Jensen P, Calum H, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy augments ciprofloxacin effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infected chronic wounds in a mouse model. Biofilm. 2023;5: 100100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jensen PO, Moller SA, Lerche CJ, Moser C, Bjarnsholt T, Ciofu O, et al. Improving antibiotic treatment of bacterial biofilm by hyperbaric oxygen therapy: not just hot air. Biofilm. 2019;1: 100008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lerche CJ, Christophersen LJ, Kolpen M, Nielsen PR, Trostrup H, Thomsen K, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy augments tobramycin efficacy in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(3):406–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kolpen M, Lerche CJ, Kragh KN, Sams T, Koren K, Jensen AS, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen sensitizes anoxic Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm to ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017. 10.1128/AAC.01024-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vinkel J, Arenkiel B, Hyldegaard O. The mechanisms of action of hyperbaric oxygen in restoring host homeostasis during sepsis. Biomolecules. 2023. 10.3390/biom13081228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kjellberg A, Zhao A, Lussier A, Hassler A, Al-Ezerjawi S, Bostrom E, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an immunomodulatory intervention in COVID-19-induced ARDS: exploring clinical outcomes and transcriptomic signatures in a randomised controlled trial. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2024;87: 102330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kjellberg A. Randomised clinical trials with hyperbaric oxygen in COVID-19 and Long COVID: transcriptomic insights into benefits and harms [Doctoral thesis]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet. 2024.
  • 24.Schwartz FA, Lerche CJ, Christophersen L, Jensen PO, Laulund AS, Woetmann A, et al. Distinct contribution of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to human neutrophil function and antibiotic efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus. APMIS. 2021;129(9):566–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moller SA, Jensen PO, Hoiby N, Ciofu O, Kragh KN, Bjarnsholt T, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment increases killing of aggregating Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. J Cyst Fibros. 2019;18(5):657–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vega JA, Garcia-Suarez O, Hannestad J, Perez-Perez M, Germana A. Neurotrophins and the immune system. J Anat. 2003;203(1):1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tomlinson RE, Li Z, Li Z, Minichiello L, Riddle RC, Venkatesan A, et al. NGF–TrkA signaling in sensory nerves is required for skeletal adaptation to mechanical loads in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(18):E3632–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee S, Hwang C, Marini S, Tower RJ, Qin Q, Negri S, et al. NGF–TrkA signaling dictates neural ingrowth and aberrant osteochondral differentiation after soft tissue trauma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Camporesi EM, Vezzani G, Bosco G, Mangar D, Bernasek TL. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in femoral head necrosis. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(6 Suppl):118–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vezzani G, Quartesan S, Cancellara P, Camporesi E, Mangar D, Bernasek T, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy modulates serum OPG/RANKL in femoral head necrosis patients. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2017;32(1):707–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Beigelman A, Levy J, Hadad N, Pinsk V, Haim A, Fruchtman Y, et al. Abnormal neutrophil chemotactic activity in children with congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA): the role of nerve growth factor. Clin Immunol. 2009;130(3):365–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hepburn L, Prajsnar TK, Klapholz C, Moreno P, Loynes CA, Ogryzko NV, et al. Innate immunity. A Spaetzle-like role for nerve growth factor beta in vertebrate immunity to Staphylococcus aureus. Science. 2014;346(6209):641–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kjellberg A, Lindholm ME, Zheng X, Liwenborg L, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Catrina S-B, et al. Comparing the blood response to hyperbaric oxygen with high-intensity interval training-a crossover study in healthy volunteers. Antioxidants. 2023;12(12):2043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pakos-Zebrucka K, Koryga I, Mnich K, Ljujic M, Samali A, Gorman AM. The integrated stress response. EMBO Rep. 2016;17(10):1374–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wei L, Ren Q, Zhang Y, Wang J. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen and nerve growth factor on the long-term neural behavior of neonatal rats with hypoxic ischemic brain damage. Acta Cir Bras. 2017;32(4):270–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Awad-Igbaria Y, Ferreira N, Keadan A, Sakas R, Edelman D, Shamir A, et al. HBO treatment enhances motor function and modulates pain development after sciatic nerve injury via protection the mitochondrial function. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chou TH, Stacy MR. Clinical applications for radiotracer imaging of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia. Mol Imaging Biol. 2020;22(2):245–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Arican P, Okudan B, Sefizade R, Naldoken S. Diagnostic value of bone SPECT/CT in patients with suspected osteomyelitis. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2019;28(3):89–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee YJ, Sadigh S, Mankad K, Kapse N, Rajeswaran G. The imaging of osteomyelitis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016;6(2):184–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available owing to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Patient/parent consent for data sharing is conditioned and new consent is required.


Articles from Journal of Medical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES