Re: missing warning in pg_import_system_collations
От | Anton Voloshin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: missing warning in pg_import_system_collations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0ad8d349-8857-bcb1-8dea-64a393017713@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: missing warning in pg_import_system_collations (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: missing warning in pg_import_system_collations
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/09/2021 01:37, Tom Lane wrote: > Another approach we could take is to deem the comment incorrect and > just remove it, codifying the current behavior of silently ignoring > unrecognized encodings. The reason that seems like it might be > appropriate is that the logic immediately below this bit silently > ignores encodings that are known but are frontend-only: > > if (!PG_VALID_BE_ENCODING(enc)) > continue; /* ignore locales for client-only encodings */ > > It's sure not very clear to me why one case deserves a message and the > other not. Perhaps they both do, which would lead to adding another > DEBUG1 message here. I'm not an expert in locales, but I think it makes some sense to be silent about encodings we have consciously decided to ignore as we have them in our tables, but marked them as frontend-only (!PG_VALID_BE_ENCODING(enc)). Just like it makes sense to do give a debug-level warning about encodings seen in locale -a output but not recognized by us at all (pg_get_encoding_from_locale(localebuf, false) < 0). Therefore I think your patch with duplicated error message is better than what we have currently. I don't see how adding debug-level messages about skipping frontend-only encodings would be of any significant use here. Unless someone more experienced in locales' subtleties would like to chime in. -- Anton Voloshin Postgres Professional, The Russian Postgres Company https://postgrespro.ru
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: