Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior
От | Alexander Pyhalov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2cca954df24b106b462bc7c2259cbd83@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Nikita Malakhov писал 2023-01-16 17:26: > Hi! > > Here's the patch that fixes this case, please check it out. > The patch adds vacuum_is_permitted_for_relation() check before adding > partition relation to the vacuum list, and if permission is denied the > relation > is not added, so it is not passed to vacuum_rel() and there are no try > to > acquire the lock. > > Cheers! Hi. The patch seems to solve the issue. Two minor questions I have: 1) should we error out if HeapTupleIsValid(part_tuple) is false? 2) comment "Check partition relations for vacuum permit" seems to be broken in some way. -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: