Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3073cc9b0907172332n4b6a2a2dx213b1a09835d4d75@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_restore --clean vs. large object (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Itagaki Takahiro<itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > The attached is a patch to execute lo_unlink() before lo_create() > in pg_restore. the patch applies almost cleanly (there are only minor and superfluos hunks), compiles... it works as expected... this patch makes me wonder why we dump or restore an object in pg_largeobject that has been deleted from the user table that had the oid... but that is another thing... i think this one could be applied, just as is... there is no need for docs, because the issue being fixed is not documented... maybe that should be in doc of older releases? -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: