Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3073cc9b0910260836g1421a09aoe1fd0d3cf2af989e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > ISTM we should apply to OSI for approval of our licence, so we can then > refer to it as the PostgreSQL licence. > IMHO and not being a lawyer, this is the only reason for anyone to think in change our license i think... even in the case both licenses are "roughly equivalent", because users are afraid of any changes. if we simply change our license for no good reason we will have a ton of questions about if PostgreSQL is being sold just as MySQL was... -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: