Re: Re: List response time...

Hey guys,

Can you move this thread elsewhere?

It's EXTREMELY off topic now.

:(

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift


Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> 
> David Ford <david@blue-labs.org> writes:
> 
> > >ooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....  I've been raggin on
> > >Marc on that one for well over a year, maybe two..  I started using
> > >qmail when it was still in .7something beta and never looked back.  The
> > >folks at Security Focus have moved all of the lists to ezmlm (part of
> > >qmail) and have had nothing but success...  But don't tell Marc.
> > >
> >
> > And ezlm is -ever- so quick to tell you your mail is bouncing when
> > your link goes down for a few hours or is sporadic.  I know of several
> > others that simply send you the emails that are in queue.
> 
> I don't know what you are referring to here.  ezmlm simply handles
> bounces generated by the MTA.  qmail does not bounce mail merely
> because a link goes down for a few hours or is sporadic.
> 
> There is an issue here which you may be referring to: vanilla ezmlm
> does not handle temporary failure DSN notices very well--it treats
> them as bounces.  This is easily fixable, and in fact I believe that
> ezmlm+idx (which is what most people use) does handle them correctly
> by default.
> 
> Ian
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

-- 
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."  - Indira Gandhi