Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4136ffa0905280857j79013e72g9cb15f829b703ed@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > > Can you cite anywhere that such techniques have been successfully used > in a production environment Well there's a reason our docs say: "Such a locking system is complex to implement and extremely expensive in execution" > or are you suggesting that we break new > ground here? (The techniques I've been assuming are pretty well-worn > and widely used.) Well they're well-worn in very different databases which have much less flexibility in how they access data. In part that inflexibility comes *from* their decision to implement transaction isolation using locks and to tie those locks to the indexing infrastructure. -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: