Re: unexpected result from to_tsvector

On 25.03.2016 18:19, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Artur,
>
> On 3/20/16 10:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de> writes:
>>> On Mar 20, 2016 01:09, "Dmitrii Golub" <dmitrii.golub@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Alex, actually subdomain can start with digit,
>>
>>> Not according to the RFC you have linked to.
>>
>> The powers-that-be relaxed that some time ago; I assume there's a newer
>> RFC.  For instance, "163.com" is a real domain:
>
> You marked this patch "needs review" and then a few minutes later
> changed it to "waiting on author".
>
> If this was a mistake please change it back to "needs review".  If you
> really are working on a new patch when can we expect that?
>
> Thanks,

Hi,

The previous patch is current, which can be commited.

I mark this patch as "needs review", because I noticed that the patch 
was marked as "waiting on author". And I thought that I forgot to mark 
as "need review".

But then I noticed that Robert Haas marked the patch as "waiting on 
author" after my answer, and I returned "waiting on author". But I cant 
find any questions or comments to me after my last answer.

Actually I think that this patch should be marked as "need review".

-- 
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company