Re: Impact of checkpoint_segments under continual load conditions
От | Christopher Petrilli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Impact of checkpoint_segments under continual load conditions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 59d991c4050719084460b376f1@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Impact of checkpoint_segments under continual load conditions (PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Impact of checkpoint_segments under continual load conditions
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 7/19/05, PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com> wrote: > > What happens if, say at iteration 6000 (a bit after the mess starts), you > pause it for a few minutes and resume. Will it restart with a plateau like > at the beginning of the test ? or not ? Not sure... my benchmark is designed to represent what the database will do under "typical" circumstances, and unfortunately these are typical for the application. However, I can see about adding some delays, though multiple minutes would be absurd in the application. Perhaps a 5-10 second day? Would that still be interesting? > What if, during this pause, you disconnect and reconnect, or restart the > postmaster, or vacuum, or analyze ? Well, I don't have the numbers any more, but restarting the postmaster has no effect, other than the first few hundreds COPYs are worse than anything (3-4x slower), but then it goes back to following the trend line. The data in the chart for v8.0.3 includes running pg_autovacuum (5 minutes). Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: