Re: return query/composite types
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: return query/composite types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b42b73150902201225g2d4694b9kde94bcd931e64c9e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: return query/composite types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: return query/composite types
Re: return query/composite types |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: >> create table foo(a int, b int); >> postgres=# create function rfoo() returns setof foo as $$ begin return >> query select foo from foo; end; $$ language plpgsql; > > Use "select * from ..." instead. Yeah...I was thinking maybe that shouldn't be required: 1. it's illogical and conflicts with regular non 'returns query' semantics (declare foo, assign, return) 2. if 'foo' is result of set returning function (like unnest), you need to make extra subquery to prevent that function from executing lots of extra times. e.g. select unnest(foo) from <something> will unnest the set six times if foo has six fields. This is a bit of a landmine since type returning functions are _fairly_ common use for composite types. These aren't really complaints since the workarounds are trivial, just casual wondering if the behavior is correct. merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: