Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans
От | Alexander Pyhalov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | e9a2104f9efabf678ddc9c0a78d62189@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane писал(а) 2025-04-02 21:09: > I wrote: >> Anyway, I feel pretty good about this patch now and am quite content >> to stop here for PG 18. > > Since feature freeze is fast approaching, I did a tiny bit more > cosmetic work on this patchset and then pushed it. (There's still > plenty of time for adjustments if you have further comments.) > > Thanks for working on this! This is something I've wanted to see > done ever since we invented plancache. > > regards, tom lane Hi. I've looked through the latest patch series, but didn't have much time to examine them thoroughly. Haven't found any issue so far. From cosmetic things I've noticed - I would set func->pcontext to NULL in sql_delete_callback() to avoid dangling pointer if we error out early (but it seems only to be a matter of taste). -- Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: