Re: On disable_cost
От | Alena Rybakina |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On disable_cost |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 104da494-03e7-4b14-9827-6a4b34c05466@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On disable_cost (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08.10.2024 18:49, Laurenz Albe wrote:
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 18:12 +0300, Alena Rybakina wrote:However you are right that this display will not appear for all nodes that only contain a data collection procedure, such as Append, MergeAppend, Gather, etc. And I agree with you that we should information about it. I also think it’s worth adding additional information that this option does not appear in the postgres_fdw extension.I cannot quite follow that either...I meant this [0]. [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpMyKJpLGWRmR3%2B3g4DxrSf6iRpwTRCXMorU0HvgWbocw%40mail.gmail.com Th disabled description won't display if the MergeAppend and Append nodes are used in the query plan. I tried to generalize it, but without success. I'm not sure that these nodes can be called accumulating data. But I tried to describe this case in the documentation.You mean you rediscovered the bug that David's patch fixes?
Sorry, it works fine. I apparently tested the wrong version of the patch. Sorry for noise.
Yes, you are right.About postgres_fdw extension disabled nodes won't show [1]. I think we should add information about it too. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZRwy8202vxbUPBeZd_Tx5NYVtmpvBnJnOzZS3b81cpkg%40mail.gmail.comYou cannot disable a foreign scan... Or do you want to see "disabled" if the remote query uses a disabled node? I think that would be out of scope...
-- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: