Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
От | Alex Turner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 33c6269f050110094646897c3e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft (Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Список | pgsql-performance |
You sir are correct! You can't use perl in MS-SQL or Oracle ;). Alex Turner NetEconomist On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:42:00 -0600, Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:33:07 +0100 > Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote: > > > Neither Oracle nor MS-SQL have the range of stored procedure > > > langauges that Postgresql supports. > > > > That is not true. Oracle uses PL/SQL for its stored procedures and > > M$-SQL does have a stored procedural language. > > By "range" I believe he meant number of stored procedure languages. > He wasn't saying they didn't have a stored procedure langauge or > support, just that PostgreSQL had more languages to choose from. > > --------------------------------- > Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org> > http://www.wiles.org > --------------------------------- > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: