Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?
От | Alex Turner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 33c6269f05040407471d716702@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Yup, Battery backed, cache enabled. 6 drive RAID 10, and 4 drive RAID 10, and 2xRAID 1. It's a 3ware 9500S-8MI - not bad for $450 plus BBU. Alex Turner netEconomist On Apr 1, 2005 6:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com> writes: > > On Apr 1, 2005 4:17 PM, Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 1250/sec with record size average is 26 bytes > >> 800/sec with record size average is 48 bytes. > >> 250/sec with record size average is 618 bytes. > > > Oh - this is with a seperate transaction per command. > > fsync is on. > > [ raised eyebrow... ] What kind of disk hardware is that exactly, and > does it have write cache enabled? It's hard to believe those numbers > if not. > > Write caching is fine if it's done in a battery-backed cache, which you > can get in the higher-end hardware RAID controllers. Otherwise you're > going to have problems whenever the power goes away unexpectedly. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: