Re: Synchronous replication: Promotion of Standby to Primary
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronous replication: Promotion of Standby to Primary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3f0b79eb0905250510s75f8ebccn4155a916f39f6cd5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Synchronous replication: Promotion of Standby to Primary ("K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan.k@nsn.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich) <harald.kolb@nsn.com> wrote: > Hello Fujii, > > my name is Harald Kolb, I'm a colleague of Niranjan and I will continue > his community work since he's currently busy with other topics. > We are looking for a fast mechanism to activate the switchover. Therfore > we prefer to use a signal to trigger the standby to become primary, > since in our case the postmaster will be started via fork by a watchdog. > The originally intended solution via SIGTERM should be ok. > In the case the mechanism will be still based on the trigger file > concept, we would require to have in addition a signal to speed up the > trigger file detection, since the periodic check might be not fast > enough. To be honest, I don't think that such quick detection shortens the failover time so much (probably it would be shortened only a few ms). Instead, we should reduce the time of checkpoint which occurs at the end of recovery/failover. It might take a few minutes to end. So, I'd like to emphasize user-friendliness rather than the failover time in the choice of the way of activation. What is your opinion? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: