Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 464860DD.2000901@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote: > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> There is a related risk even on Unix machines: two postmasters can be >> started on the same port number if they have different settings of >> unix_socket_directory, and then it's indeterminate which one you will >> contact if you connect to the TCP port. I seem to recall that we >> discussed this several years ago, and didn't really find a satisfactory >> way of interlocking the TCP port per se. > > I'm curious as to which Unix systems allow multiple processes to listen > on the same port at the same time.. On Linux, and I thought on most, > you get an EADDRINUSE on the listen() call (which the postmaster should > pick up on and bomb out, which it may already). Linux certainly does. Windows seems to treat SO_REUSEADDR in the same way as SO_REUSEPORT which just seems wrong. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: