Re: quoting psql varible as identifier
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: quoting psql varible as identifier |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f071001101955s44beed76lcbb69c10c606c9e9@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: quoting psql varible as identifier (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: quoting psql varible as identifier
Re: quoting psql varible as identifier |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/1/5 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I don't have a problem to write second and safe fmtId >>>> function (with technique used in dumputils don't need to modify >>>> libpq), although fmtId do exactly what I need. I would to understand >>>> to behave. >> >>> I think you mean that you would need to understand how it should >>> behave - in which case I agree, but I think Tom spelled that out >>> pretty clearly upthread: close PQescapeStringConn and adapt it to be >>> PQescapeIdentifier. >> >> The more important point here is that fmtId doesn't do "exactly what you >> need" in any case. fmtId is safe to use in pg_dump because pg_dump is >> only expected to work with the same or older version of the backend. >> It would not be safe to use it in libpq, which is expected to still work >> with newer backends that might have more reserved words. > > So I finnaly moved to libpq PQescapeIdentConn function > > patch is attached. No longer applies, please rebase. Thanks, ...Robert
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: