039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test
От | Anton Voloshin |
---|---|
Тема | 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b26aeac2-cb6d-4633-a7ea-945baae83dcf@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, hackers, I believe there is a small problem in the 039_end_of_wal.pl's "xl_tot_len zero" test. It supposes that after immediate shutdown the server, upon startup recovery, should always produce a message matching "invalid record length at .*: wanted 24, got 0". However, if the circumstances are just right and we happened to hit exactly on the edge of WAL page, then the message on startup recovery would be "invalid magic number 0000 in log segment .*, offset .*". The test does not take that into account. Now, reproducing this is somewhat tricky, because exact position in WAL at the test time depends on what exactly initdb did, and that not only differs in different major verisons, but also depends on e.g. username length, locales available, and, perhaps, more. Even though originally this problem was found "in the wild" on one particular system on one particular code branch, I've written small helper patch to make reproduction on master easier, see 0001-repro-for-039_end_of_wal-s-problem-with-page-end.patch. This patch adds single emit_message of (hopefully) the right size to make sure we hit end of WAL block right by the time we call $node->stop('immediate') in "xl_tot_len zero" test. With this patch, "xl_tot_len zero" test fails every time because the server writes "invalid magic number 0000 in log segment" while the test still only expects "invalid record length at .*: wanted 24, got 0". If course, this 0001 patch is *not* meant to be committed, but only as an issue reproduction helper. I can think of two possible fixes: 1. Update advance_out_of_record_splitting_zone to also avoid stopping at exactly the block end: my $page_offset = $end_lsn % $WAL_BLOCK_SIZE; - while ($page_offset >= $WAL_BLOCK_SIZE - $page_threshold) + while ($page_offset >= $WAL_BLOCK_SIZE - $page_threshold || $page_offset <= $SizeOfXLogShortPHD) { see 0002-fix-xl_tot_len-zero-test-amend-advance_out_of.patch We need to compare with $SizeOfXLogShortPHD (and not with zero) because at that point, even though we didn't actually write out new WAL page yet, it's header is already in place in memory and taken in account for LSN reporting. 2. Alternatively, amend "xl_tot_len zero" test to expect "invalid magic number 0000 in WAL segment" message as well: $node->start; ok( $node->log_contains( + "invalid magic number 0000 in WAL segment|" . "invalid record length at .*: expected at least 24, got 0", $log_size ), see 0003-alt.fix-for-xl_tot_len-zero-test-accept-invalid.patch I think it makes sense to backport whatever the final change would be to all branches with 039_end_of_wal (REL_12+). Any thoughts? Anton Voloshin Postgres Professional, The Russian Postgres Company https://postgrespro.ru
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: