Re: Issue with DataBaseMetaData.GetTypeInfo()
От | Mats Ekelund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issue with DataBaseMetaData.GetTypeInfo() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | c2dd00540804070419v60216e0fp998e66b56b320e6d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issue with DataBaseMetaData.GetTypeInfo() (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issue with DataBaseMetaData.GetTypeInfo()
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Here is a more general solution: the mapping is done for SQL types since it should be a fixed number of types. Mats Ekelund 2008/3/31, Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>: > Mats Ekelund wrote: > > > > I have attached the patch. > > > > Please keep the mailing list CCed so all can see/participate in the > discussion. > > + else if ( typname.equals("varchar") || typname.equals("char") > || typname.equals("text") || > + typname.equals("name") || typname.equals("timestamp") > || typname.equals("timestamptz") ) > + { > + tuple[3] = connection.encodeString("'"); > + tuple[4] = connection.encodeString("'"); > + } > > > Your patch hard codes this for a couple of types, but it doesn't seem to be > a general solution. It seems impossible to enumerate all the possible types > that require quoting. What about any user defined types, we can't possible > know what those are in the driver? > > If you were going to hardcode a list, you need to hardcode the list of types > that don't require quoting because that should at least be a fixed list. A > more general solution would be to put this information into TypeInfoCache so > you could say something like > TypeInfoCache.requiresQuoting(typeOid). > > Kris Jurka >
Вложения
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: