Re: dell versus hp
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dell versus hp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10711090855j42ce308co1bbbe103ff04c706@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dell versus hp ("Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dell versus hp
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Nov 9, 2007 10:40 AM, Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com> wrote: > > Apart from the disks, you might also investigate using Opterons instead > > of Xeons. there appears to be some significant dent in performance > > between Opteron and Xeon. Xeons appear to spend more time in passing > > around ownership of memory cache lines in case of a spinlock. > > It's not yet clear whether or not here has been worked around the issue. > > You should at least investigate it a bit. > > > > We're using a HP DL385 ourselves which performs quite well. > > Not atm. Until new benchmarks are published comparing AMD's new > quad-core with Intel's ditto, Intel has the edge. > > http://tweakers.net/reviews/657/6 For 8 cores, it appears AMD has the lead, read this (stolen from another thread): http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/7.0%20Preview.pdf
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: