Re: Question on partitioning
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question on partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | dcc563d10808210950u91864bcl50b68b0d7b51f02f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Question on partitioning ("Oliveiros Cristina" <oliveiros.cristina@marktest.pt>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Oliveiros Cristina <oliveiros.cristina@marktest.pt> wrote: > Hello , All. > > I am not sure if this is the right mailing list to place this question. > If it doesn't, please kindly redirect me to the right list. > > I have a giant table with about 10,6 million records. 10.6 million rows isn't really gigantic. It's a good size, but unless you're hitting a lot of the records at once, you should be able to get pretty good performance if it's indexed properly. > Queries on it are usually slow, and if I try to do something more elaborate > like an INNER JOIN with itself it becomes unnacceptably slow. > > I am looking for a way to improve performance. > One of the columns is of type date. Each "day" includes about a few tens of > thousands records > And the older a date is the less likely I am to do queries on it. Well, first let's look at your indexes and if they're being used. Got an explain analyze output of your slow queries for us to look at?
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: