Re: Postgres on RAID5
От | PFC |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres on RAID5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | opsnh534mcth1vuj@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres on RAID5 (Arshavir Grigorian <ag@m-cam.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Look for the possibility that a foreign key check might not be using an index. This would yield a seq scan for each insertion, which might be your problem. On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:22:56 -0500, Arshavir Grigorian <ag@m-cam.com> wrote: > Many thanks for all the response. > > I guess there are a lot of things to change and tweak and I wonder what > would be a good benchmarking sample dataset (size, contents). > > My tables are very large (the smallest is 7+ mil records) and take > several days to load (if not weeks). It would be nice to have a sample > dataset that would be large enough to mimic my large datasets, but small > enough to load in a short priod of time. Any suggestions? > > > Arshavir > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: