Hip circumduction is not a compensation for reduced knee flexion angle during gait

It has long been held that hip abduction compensates for reduced swing-phase knee flexion angle, especially in those after stroke. However, there are other compensatory motions such as pelvic obliquity (hip hiking) that could also be used to facilitate foot clearance with greater energy efficiency. Our previous work suggested that hip abduction may not be a compensation for reduced knee flexion after stroke. Previous study applied robotic knee flexion assistance in people with post-stroke Stiff-Knee Gait (SKG) during pre-swing, finding increased abduction despite improved knee flexion and toe clearance. Thus, our hypothesis was that hip abduction is not a compensation for reduced knee flexion. We simulated the kinematics of post-stroke SKG on unimpaired individuals with three factors: a knee orthosis to reduce knee flexion, an ankle-foot orthosis commonly worn by those post-stroke, and matching gait speeds. We compared spatiotemporal measures and kinematics between experimental factors within healthy controls and with a previously recorded cohort of people with post-stroke SKG. We focused on frontal plane motions of hip and pelvis as possible compensatory mechanisms. We observed that regardless of gait speed, knee flexion restriction increased pelvic obliquity (2.8°, p < 0.01) compared to unrestricted walking (1.5°, p < 0.01), but similar to post-stroke SKG (3.4°). However, those with post-stroke SKG had greater hip abduction (8.2°) compared to unimpaired individuals with restricted knee flexion (4.2°, p < 0.05). These results show that pelvic obliquity, not hip abduction, compensates for reduced knee flexion angle. Thus, other factors, possibly neural, facilitate exaggerated hip abduction observed in post-stroke SKG.