The bitcoin backbone protocol with chains of variable difficulty
Annual International Cryptology Conference, 2017•Springer
Bitcoin's innovative and distributedly maintained blockchain data structure hinges on the
adequate degree of difficulty of so-called “proofs of work,” which miners have to produce in
order for transactions to be inserted. Importantly, these proofs of work have to be hard
enough so that miners have an opportunity to unify their views in the presence of an
adversary who interferes but has bounded computational power, but easy enough to be
solvable regularly and enable the miners to make progress. As such, as the miners' …
adequate degree of difficulty of so-called “proofs of work,” which miners have to produce in
order for transactions to be inserted. Importantly, these proofs of work have to be hard
enough so that miners have an opportunity to unify their views in the presence of an
adversary who interferes but has bounded computational power, but easy enough to be
solvable regularly and enable the miners to make progress. As such, as the miners' …
Abstract
Bitcoin’s innovative and distributedly maintained blockchain data structure hinges on the adequate degree of difficulty of so-called “proofs of work,” which miners have to produce in order for transactions to be inserted. Importantly, these proofs of work have to be hard enough so that miners have an opportunity to unify their views in the presence of an adversary who interferes but has bounded computational power, but easy enough to be solvable regularly and enable the miners to make progress. As such, as the miners’ population evolves over time, so should the difficulty of these proofs. Bitcoin provides this adjustment mechanism, with empirical evidence of a constant block generation rate against such population changes.
In this paper we provide the first formal analysis of Bitcoin’s target (re)calculation function in the cryptographic setting, i.e., against all possible adversaries aiming to subvert the protocol’s properties. We extend the q-bounded synchronous model of the Bitcoin backbone protocol [Eurocrypt 2015], which posed the basic properties of Bitcoin’s underlying blockchain data structure and shows how a robust public transaction ledger can be built on top of them, to environments that may introduce or suspend parties in each round.
We provide a set of necessary conditions with respect to the way the population evolves under which the “Bitcoin backbone with chains of variable difficulty” provides a robust transaction ledger in the presence of an actively malicious adversary controlling a fraction of the miners strictly below at each instant of the execution. Our work introduces new analysis techniques and tools to the area of blockchain systems that may prove useful in analyzing other blockchain protocols.
Springer