Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review

L Laranjo, AG Dunn, HL Tong… - Journal of the …, 2018 - academic.oup.com
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2018academic.oup.com
Objective Our objective was to review the characteristics, current applications, and
evaluation measures of conversational agents with unconstrained natural language input
capabilities used for health-related purposes. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase,
CINAHL, PsycInfo, and ACM Digital using a predefined search strategy. Studies were
included if they focused on consumers or healthcare professionals; involved a
conversational agent using any unconstrained natural language input; and reported …
Objective
Our objective was to review the characteristics, current applications, and evaluation measures of conversational agents with unconstrained natural language input capabilities used for health-related purposes.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and ACM Digital using a predefined search strategy. Studies were included if they focused on consumers or healthcare professionals; involved a conversational agent using any unconstrained natural language input; and reported evaluation measures resulting from user interaction with the system. Studies were screened by independent reviewers and Cohen’s kappa measured inter-coder agreement.
Results
The database search retrieved 1513 citations; 17 articles (14 different conversational agents) met the inclusion criteria. Dialogue management strategies were mostly finite-state and frame-based (6 and 7 conversational agents, respectively); agent-based strategies were present in one type of system. Two studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was cross-sectional, and the remaining were quasi-experimental. Half of the conversational agents supported consumers with health tasks such as self-care. The only RCT evaluating the efficacy of a conversational agent found a significant effect in reducing depression symptoms (effect size d = 0.44, p = .04). Patient safety was rarely evaluated in the included studies.
Conclusions
The use of conversational agents with unconstrained natural language input capabilities for health-related purposes is an emerging field of research, where the few published studies were mainly quasi-experimental, and rarely evaluated efficacy or safety. Future studies would benefit from more robust experimental designs and standardized reporting.
Protocol Registration
The protocol for this systematic review is registered at PROSPERO with the number CRD42017065917.
Oxford University Press