Fecal incontinence: community prevalence and associated factors—a systematic review

KS Ng, Y Sivakumaran, N Nassar… - Diseases of the Colon …, 2015 - journals.lww.com
KS Ng, Y Sivakumaran, N Nassar, MA Gladman
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2015journals.lww.com
BACKGROUND: Fecal incontinence is a chronic and debilitating condition with significant
health burden. Despite its clinical relevance, the prevalence of fecal incontinence remains
inconsistently described. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the
literature regarding the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence among
community-dwelling adults. DATA SOURCES: A search of the PubMed, Embase, and
Cochrane databases was performed. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that reported the …
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Fecal incontinence is a chronic and debilitating condition with significant health burden. Despite its clinical relevance, the prevalence of fecal incontinence remains inconsistently described.
OBJECTIVE:
This study aimed to systematically review the literature regarding the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence among community-dwelling adults.
DATA SOURCES:
A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed.
STUDY SELECTION:
Studies that reported the prevalence of fecal incontinence and/or associated factors in a community-based (ie, unselected) adult population were included. Two independent assessors reviewed eligible articles.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Relevant data were extracted from each study and presented in descriptive form. The main outcome measures included the prevalence of fecal incontinence (adjusted and/or unadjusted), stratified for age and sex if reported; factors associated (and not associated) with fecal incontinence; and study quality, assessed using predefined criteria.
RESULTS:
Of 3523 citations identified, 38 studies were included for review. The reported median prevalence of fecal incontinence was 7.7%(range, 2.0%–20.7%). Fecal incontinence equally affected both men (median, 8.1%; range, 2.3%–16.1%) and women (median, 8.9%; range, 2.0%–20.7%) and increased with age (15–34 years, 5.7%;> 90 years, 15.9%). The study populations and diagnostic criteria used were heterogeneous, precluding any meaningful pooling of prevalence estimates. Study quality assessment revealed 6 high-quality studies, of which only 3 were performed in a representative sample. The median prevalence of fecal incontinence was higher in these studies at 11.2%(range, 8.3%–13.2%). The factors most commonly reported to be associated with fecal incontinence included increasing age, diarrhea, and urinary incontinence.
LIMITATIONS:
Heterogeneity of studies precluded meaningful pooling or meta-analysis of data.
CONCLUSIONS:
Fecal incontinence is a prevalent condition of equal sex distribution, affecting≈ 1 in 8 community adults, and has identifiable associated factors. The paucity of high-quality prevalence studies emphasizes the need for future population-based studies that use standardized diagnostic criteria for fecal incontinence.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins