Architecting phase change memory as a scalable dram alternative

BC Lee, E Ipek, O Mutlu, D Burger - Proceedings of the 36th annual …, 2009 - dl.acm.org
Proceedings of the 36th annual international symposium on Computer architecture, 2009dl.acm.org
Memory scaling is in jeopardy as charge storage and sensing mechanisms become less
reliable for prevalent memory technologies, such as DRAM. In contrast, phase change
memory (PCM) storage relies on scalable current and thermal mechanisms. To exploit
PCM's scalability as a DRAM alternative, PCM must be architected to address relatively long
latencies, high energy writes, and finite endurance. We propose, crafted from a fundamental
understanding of PCM technology parameters, area-neutral architectural enhancements that …
Memory scaling is in jeopardy as charge storage and sensing mechanisms become less reliable for prevalent memory technologies, such as DRAM. In contrast, phase change memory (PCM) storage relies on scalable current and thermal mechanisms. To exploit PCM's scalability as a DRAM alternative, PCM must be architected to address relatively long latencies, high energy writes, and finite endurance.
We propose, crafted from a fundamental understanding of PCM technology parameters, area-neutral architectural enhancements that address these limitations and make PCM competitive with DRAM. A baseline PCM system is 1.6x slower and requires 2.2x more energy than a DRAM system. Buffer reorganizations reduce this delay and energy gap to 1.2x and 1.0x, using narrow rows to mitigate write energy and multiple rows to improve locality and write coalescing. Partial writes enhance memory endurance, providing 5.6 years of lifetime. Process scaling will further reduce PCM energy costs and improve endurance.
ACM Digital Library