CakeML: a verified implementation of ML
We have developed and mechanically verified an ML system called CakeML, which
supports a substantial subset of Standard ML. CakeML is implemented as an interactive
read-eval-print loop (REPL) in x86-64 machine code. Our correctness theorem ensures that
this REPL implementation prints only those results permitted by the semantics of CakeML.
Our verification effort touches on a breadth of topics including lexing, parsing, type checking,
incremental and dynamic compilation, garbage collection, arbitrary-precision arithmetic, and …
supports a substantial subset of Standard ML. CakeML is implemented as an interactive
read-eval-print loop (REPL) in x86-64 machine code. Our correctness theorem ensures that
this REPL implementation prints only those results permitted by the semantics of CakeML.
Our verification effort touches on a breadth of topics including lexing, parsing, type checking,
incremental and dynamic compilation, garbage collection, arbitrary-precision arithmetic, and …
We have developed and mechanically verified an ML system called CakeML, which supports a substantial subset of Standard ML. CakeML is implemented as an interactive read-eval-print loop (REPL) in x86-64 machine code. Our correctness theorem ensures that this REPL implementation prints only those results permitted by the semantics of CakeML. Our verification effort touches on a breadth of topics including lexing, parsing, type checking, incremental and dynamic compilation, garbage collection, arbitrary-precision arithmetic, and compiler bootstrapping.
Our contributions are twofold. The first is simply in building a system that is end-to-end verified, demonstrating that each piece of such a verification effort can in practice be composed with the others, and ensuring that none of the pieces rely on any over-simplifying assumptions. The second is developing novel approaches to some of the more challenging aspects of the verification. In particular, our formally verified compiler can bootstrap itself: we apply the verified compiler to itself to produce a verified machine-code implementation of the compiler. Additionally, our compiler proof handles diverging input programs with a lightweight approach based on logical timeout exceptions. The entire development was carried out in the HOL4 theorem prover.
ACM Digital Library