Talking AI into being: The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics
J Bareis, C Katzenbach - Science, Technology, & Human …, 2022 - journals.sagepub.com
Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2022•journals.sagepub.com
How to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the functioning and structures of
our society has become a concern of contemporary politics and public debates. In this
paper, we investigate national AI strategies as a peculiar form of co-shaping this
development, a hybrid of policy and discourse that offers imaginaries, allocates resources,
and sets rules. Conceptually, the paper is informed by sociotechnical imaginaries, the
sociology of expectations, myths, and the sublime. Empirically we analyze AI policy …
our society has become a concern of contemporary politics and public debates. In this
paper, we investigate national AI strategies as a peculiar form of co-shaping this
development, a hybrid of policy and discourse that offers imaginaries, allocates resources,
and sets rules. Conceptually, the paper is informed by sociotechnical imaginaries, the
sociology of expectations, myths, and the sublime. Empirically we analyze AI policy …
How to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the functioning and structures of our society has become a concern of contemporary politics and public debates. In this paper, we investigate national AI strategies as a peculiar form of co-shaping this development, a hybrid of policy and discourse that offers imaginaries, allocates resources, and sets rules. Conceptually, the paper is informed by sociotechnical imaginaries, the sociology of expectations, myths, and the sublime. Empirically we analyze AI policy documents of four key players in the field, namely China, the United States, France, and Germany. The results show that the narrative construction of AI strategies is strikingly similar: they all establish AI as an inevitable and massively disrupting technological development by building on rhetorical devices such as a grand legacy and international competition. Having established this inevitable, yet uncertain, AI future, national leaders proclaim leadership intervention and articulate opportunities and distinct national pathways. While this narrative construction is quite uniform, the respective AI imaginaries are remarkably different, reflecting the vast cultural, political, and economic differences of the countries under study. As governments endow these imaginary pathways with massive resources and investments, they contribute to coproducing the installment of these futures and, thus, yield a performative lock-in function.
Sage Journals