A substantial amount of all quality problems that arise during assembly can be referred back to the geometrical design, and especially the geometrical concept of the product, i.e. the way in which parts are designed and located with each other. Special emphasis should thus be put on geometry design, especially during the early design phases, to try to find robust concepts and avoid solutions that may cause down-stream production problems.

 This paper presents a generic set of evaluation tools for robust geometry design encountering (i) potential tolerance chain detection in configuration design, (ii) assembly robustness evaluation in concept design, and (iii) tolerance sensitivity analysis in detail design. Special attention is given to the development of a new matrix-based evaluation tool for the configuration design part. The tool presented is based on a new way of representing geometry variation constraints in an enhanced function-means tree structure model. Different parts of the function-means tree that are of interest for analysis purposes are then extracted and converted to matrix representation. The reason for doing this is that the structure model is most suitable for modeling, but becomes unsuitable for analysis as the model complexity increases. For this latter purpose, the matrix representation is far better. The use of the different tools is demonstrated in the design of a new vehicle front system for which the geometry a priori is unknown.