Ultrasound pretreatment as an useful tool to enhance egg white protein hydrolysis: kinetics, reaction model, and thermodinamics

JR Jovanović, AB Stefanović, NŽ Šekuljica… - Journal of Food …, 2016 - Wiley Online Library
JR Jovanović, AB Stefanović, NŽ Šekuljica, SMJ Tanasković, MB Dojčinović, BM Bugarski
Journal of Food Science, 2016Wiley Online Library
The impact of ultrasound waves generated by probe‐type sonicator and ultrasound cleaning
bath on egg white protein susceptibility to hydrolysis by alcalase compared to both thermal
pretreatment and conventional enzymatic hydrolysis was quantitatively investigated. A
series of hydrolytic reactions was carried out in a stirred tank reactor at different substrate
concentrations, enzyme concentrations, and temperatures using untreated, and pretreated
egg white proteins (EWPs). The kinetic model based on substrate inhibition and second …
Abstract
The impact of ultrasound waves generated by probe‐type sonicator and ultrasound cleaning bath on egg white protein susceptibility to hydrolysis by alcalase compared to both thermal pretreatment and conventional enzymatic hydrolysis was quantitatively investigated. A series of hydrolytic reactions was carried out in a stirred tank reactor at different substrate concentrations, enzyme concentrations, and temperatures using untreated, and pretreated egg white proteins (EWPs). The kinetic model based on substrate inhibition and second‐order enzyme deactivation successfully predicts the experimental behavior providing an effective tool for comparison and optimization.
The ultrasound pretreatments appear to greatly improve the enzymatic hydrolysis of EWPs under different conditions when compare to other methods. The apparent reaction rate constants for proteolysis (k2) are 0.009, 0.011, 0.053, and 0.045 min−1 for untreated EWPs, and those pretreated with heat, probe‐type sonicator, and ultrasound cleaning bath technologies, respectively. The ultrasound pretreatment also decreases hydrolysis activation (Ea) and enzyme deactivation (Ed) energy, enthalpy (ΔH), and entropy (ΔS) of activation and for the probe‐type sonication this decrease is 61.7%, 61.6%, 63.6%, and 32.2%, respectively, but ultrasound has little change in Gibbs free energy value in the temperature range of 318 to 338 K. The content of sulfhydryl groups and ζ potential show a significant increase (P < 0.05) for both applied ultrasound pretreatments and the reduction of particle size distribution are achieved, providing some evidence that the ultrasound causes EWP structural changes affecting the proteolysis rate.
Wiley Online Library