This is the html version of the file https://www.earth-prints.org/handle/2122/3679.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
Fast geophysical prospecting applied to archaeology: results at «Villa ai Cavallacci» (Albano Laziale, Rome) site
  Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Page 1
291
ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 50, N. 3, June 2007
Key words archaeology – integrated geophysical
prospecting – GPR – geoelectric tomography – mag-
netic survey
1. Introduction
It is well known that, especially in archaeol-
ogy, economic and human resources are scant.
Digging is expensive, takes a long time and
sometimes is also unfruitful. Geophysical sur-
veying provides a relatively fast, non invasive
and low cost tool that succeeds in obtaining dif-
ferent kinds of information on shallow subsur-
face features. The purpose of the geophysical
survey is, in fact, to investigate the site response
to different geophysical prospecting, to define
the position of interesting structures that can be
investigated by archaeologists.
In the case of Villa ai Cavallacci sited in Al-
bano Laziale (Rome) and reported in fig. 1, the
authors carried out an acquisition test using dif-
ferent geophysical methods, focused to obtain a
high-resolution data set. An archaeological exca-
vation (performed in September 2005) carried
out according to what had been previously point-
ed out by geophysics, yielded many ruins. In par-
ticular an ancient room with a collapsed roof was
revealed, confirming the importance of the co-
operation between the expertises of both archae-
ology and geophysics.
2. Site archeological characteristics
In Republican and Imperial times, a number
of famous Romans built country houses and vil-
Fast geophysical prospecting
applied to archaeology:
results at «Villa ai Cavallacci»
(Albano Laziale, Rome) site
Stefano Urbini (1), Lili Cafarella (1), Marco Marchetti (1), Pino Chiarucci (2) and Davide Bonini (3)
(1) Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy
(2) Museo Civico di Albano Laziale, Albano Laziale (RM), Italy
(3) Dipartimento per il Territorio e le sue Risorse (DipTeRis), Università degli Studi di Genova, Italy
Abstract
The present essay is the result of a cooperative work between geophysicists and archaeologists in which the authors
carried out an integrated geophysical prospecting in an archaeological site near Rome. This paper describes the
methodology and the results of a geophysical survey carried out on Villa ai Cavallacci, an ancient roman building in
Albano Laziale (Rome) discovered in the late seventies. It is often possible to obtain very important results planning
a fast geophysical survey opportunely; within this framework (due to the fact that an archaeological excavation was
planned in a short time), an integrated geophysical techniques survey (GPR, magnetic, and geoelectric tomography)
has been carried out on the areas indicated by the archaeologists. Even if the described geophysical survey should be
considered only a first step analysis, the data pointed out some very interesting features confirmed by the excavation.
Mailing address: Dr. Stefano Urbini, Istituto Naziona-
le di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata 605,
00143 Roma, Italy; e-mail: urbinis@ingv.it

Page 2
292
Stefano Urbini, Lili Cafarella, Marco Marchetti, Pino Chiarucci and Davide Bonini
las in the Alban Hills, especially in the Albano
Laziale town area. Some of these were great lux-
ury buildings, such as the Roman villa discovered
in the Cavallacci area, in Via Verdi. The villa
probably belonged to a member of the imperial
family because, during excavations, a large quan-
tity of fine-quality marble emerged. The Villa ai
Cavallacci was discovered in 1975 but the archae-
ological investigation (performed by the Civic
Museum of Albano Laziale) started only ten
years later, in 1986 and is still in progress. Only a
small part of the archaeological site was excavat-
ed and the aim of the geophysical survey was to
realize a spatial reconstruction of shallow buried
walls and rooms, to define new possible excava-
tion sites. The digging has revealed many mason-
ry structures, rooms with mosaic and polychrome
marble floors. The structure, which was built to-
wards the end of the republican period, reached
the height of its magnificence during the Tiberius
era and in III century A.D. under Severus age. It
was inhabited until V century A.D. (Chiarucci,
1990). Starting from the end of the III century
A.D. the building was used only as a burial place
until the residential building, already neglected
and quit, became a country villa.
3. Geophysical methods
The primary goal of this survey was the
identification of targets of potential interest in
an area partially investigated by archaeologists
in previous excavations. To obtain high resolu-
tion results in a short time, a preliminary mag-
netic analysis and a large step GPR grid were
carried out on the areas indicated by the archae-
ologists. Then some new GPR and geoelectrical
profiles were performed to obtain new details
on the most interesting areas identified by the
preliminary investigation.
3.1. GPR survey
The GPR method is based on the reflection
of an electromagnetic wave due to one or more
discontinuities in the media dielectric proper-
ties. The main physical factor that can generate
a reflected radar wave is the dielectric contrast
between different media. Buried shallow walls
and holes generate a good contrast in the field
of dielectric properties providing a possible and
resolvable target for the GPR method (Annan
and Cosway, 1992; Jol and Smith, 1992; Ben-
son, 1995; Daniels, 1996; Basile et al., 2000).
Analysing the direct waves on a WARR test
dataset produced a value of about 5.7 for the di-
electric constant of the surrounding medium (a
silty sand) using an averaged electromagnetic
wave speed of about 0.125 m/ns. The buried
structures were essentially made of limestone
blocks and marble floors; both showed a good
dielectric contrast from surrounding medium
properties.
GPR profiles were mainly carried out along
NW and SW directions, as shown in fig. 2, by
GSSI Sir10B instrumentation equipped with a
400 MHz monostatic antenna.
Unfortunately, many anthropic obstacles
(excavation scraps, power lines, etc.) hold up a
regular spaced acquisition greed. For this rea-
son, we employed a two step profiling method.
First, lines were acquired 3 m spaced and then,
according to the results of the recorded GPR
profiles, they were thickened as much as possi-
ble only where it was needed.
The acquired profiles showed many archaeo-
logically interesting anomalies. Figure 3 shows
the position of some of them by A, B and C box-
es, where red and green indicate anomalies
linked to buried walls and flat high energy reflec-
Fig. 1. Location of the survey site.

Page 3
293
Fast geophysical prospecting applied to archaeology: results at «Villa ai Cavallacci» (Albano Laziale, Rome) site
Fig. 2. Acquisition scheme: GPR profile (black lines); geoelectric tomography (red lines); magnetic survey
(gray area).
Fig. 3. Structures pointed out by the GPR investigation.

Page 4
294
Stefano Urbini, Lili Cafarella, Marco Marchetti, Pino Chiarucci and Davide Bonini
tors respectively. The structures located in area B
seem to be the extension of the excavated and
visible ruins, while anomalies in the upper part
of A and C areas could be linked to the same
structure. Figure 4 reports an example of one of
these radar profiles (Alb 4.8): yellow boxes iden-
tify anomalies that show shape, energy and
alignment suggesting they could be generated by
buried walls 35-40 cm wide. In the same figure
the flat high-energy reflection in the blue box
(occurred at 29 ns, from 5 to 9 m along the line)
could be generated by a buried floor. Right above
this reflection, as shown in the figure, electro-
magnetic wave propagation changes rapidly
probably because of a different kind of filling
material between the two walls (probably filling
full of air). Looking at the local excavated ruins
and from a digging test, the authors’ interpreta-
tion was oriented towards a room with a col-
lapsed roof. In order to verify this result, addi-
tional GPR lines were carried out on the more in-
teresting zones. Then the reflections from two
perpendicular lines (Alb 4.8 and Alb 4.5 report-
ed in fig. 5) were compared. With a radar wave
speed of 0.125 m/ns, both radar profiles pointed
out a continuous flat reflection 1.8 m deep. Also
the previously identified filling area was clearly
observed along both directions.
Finally a 3D slices reconstruction was at-
tempted. Figure 6 overlaps the time slices locat-
ed at a depth of 0.5 m on the map confirming
previous results.
3.2. Geoelectric tomography
Geoelectrical tomography on archaeological
sites indicates spatial differences in sediment
moistures: the presence of features like architec-
ture, activity areas and archaeological remains
can be detected if the amount of moisture they re-
tain is different from the surrounding sediment
(Bernabini et al., 1988; Brizzolari et al., 1992;
Pellerin and Wannamaker, 2005). This technique
allows a picture of the electrical properties of the
subsurface to be built by passing an electrical cur-
rent along different paths and measuring the asso-
ciated voltages. Multi-electrode instrumentation
permits several resistivity measurements to be
made with different methods at the same time
(Jordan and Costantini, 1999). This work used
only a dipole-dipole configuration. The dipole-di-
pole array is very sensitive to horizontal changes
in resistivity, so it can be used to map vertical
structures such as dykes and cavities. This inves-
tigation made three profiles using a resistivity
Fig. 4. Migrated and stacked GPR section Alb 4.8 (see fig. 3 for line position). Yellow boxes indicate anom-
alies due to wall response while blue box indicates a flat high-energy reflection probably due to a buried floor.
The white box indicates a room filled up with backfill.

Page 5
295
Fast geophysical prospecting applied to archaeology: results at «Villa ai Cavallacci» (Albano Laziale, Rome) site
Fig. 5. Perpendicular GPR lines Alb 4.8 and Alb 4.5 plot showed the 2D continuity of anomaly due to the
buried room.
Fig. 6. Overlap between two 0.5 m depth 3D GPR model slices and the site map.

Page 6
296
Stefano Urbini, Lili Cafarella, Marco Marchetti, Pino Chiarucci and Davide Bonini
meter Iris-Syscal R2. The profiles were carried
out by means of dipole-dipole electrode arrays,
using electrodes with 1 m (the two N-W profiles)
and 0.5 m (for the S-W) spacing respectively. Al-
so multi-electrode profiles were carried out to in-
vestigate the existence of the (interpreted) buried
room pointed out by the GPR analysis. The three
geoelectrical profiles were positioned according
to the three most meaningful GPR lines. The se-
lected electrode spacings were able to clearly de-
tect the possible presence of a filled gap. Figure 7
reports the geoelectrical dd32-0.5C profile as an
example. The searched filled gap is visible on the
plot as a large red spot. The improved resolution
of 0.5 m electrodes spacing also allowed the iden-
tification (in spite of its reduced depth informa-
tion) of a wall structure 40-50 cm wide (same fig-
ure dotted line box). Geoelectric tomography
confirms the GPR anomalies map and fig. 8 re-
ports the perfect overlapping of resistivity and di-
electric anomalies.
During September 2005 archaeologists per-
formed a digging campaign and they followed
the geophysics indications. Many results were
confirmed, and in particular the identified room
with a collapsed roof was revealed (see fig. 9).
3.3. Magnetic survey
Finally, a magnetic survey was performed on
an area of about 440 m2. The aim of a magnetic
survey is to reveal contrast in the magnetic prop-
erty of the soils on the basis of anomalies induced
in the Earth’s magnetic field (Weymounth and
Huggins, 1985). Magnetic method is usually used
in archaeological exploration to detect features
such as buried walls and structures, pottery,
bricks, fire pits, buried pathways, tombs and nu-
merous objects. The features are detected and
mapped as a result of their being more magnetic
than surrounding material (Patella, 1991).
This investigation collected magnetic data
using an optically pumped caesium magne-
tometer Geometrics G858 in gradiometer con-
figuration (two sensors mounted on a vertical
Fig. 7. Geoelectric multi-electrode dipole-dipole profile. Dotted line box identifies anomaly due to a wall struc-
ture. The white box shows the anomaly linked to the room.

Page 7
297
Fast geophysical prospecting applied to archaeology: results at «Villa ai Cavallacci» (Albano Laziale, Rome) site
Fig. 8. Overlap between main GPR (gray) and geoelectrical anomalies.
Fig. 9. Results of the September 2005 excavation. The wall of an ancient room are very evident in the picture.
Following digging revealed that the room is filled with roofing material, as the authors presumed.
staff at a distance of 0.5 m apart). About 1500
measurements were made in 42 profiles spaced
0.5 m with a sampling step of 0.5 m. In the
studied site, the magnetic method was not very
decisive. Magnetic measures were affected by
low contrast in magnetic properties between
structures and surrounding medium, recent hu-
man activities (agriculture for example), exca-

Page 8
298
Fig. 10. Magnetic vertical gradient anomaly map.
Stefano Urbini, Lili Cafarella, Marco Marchetti, Pino Chiarucci and Davide Bonini
vations and the presence of many abandoned
steel materials. Therefore clear magnetic anom-
alies referable to the buried features are not
very evident on the maps of the magnetic verti-
cal gradient (fig. 10). The central part of the fig-
ure shows a large anomaly. It is linked to a steel
sheet partially buried in the investigated area
and conceals a possible anomaly related to the
ruins both detected by the GPR and geoelectri-
cal analysis. Only an anomaly (black box in fig.
10) is probably referable to buried structures
(probably walls) also resulting from the GPR
investigation (see fig. 3, box C).
4. Conclusions
This paper reports the results of an integrat-
ed geophysical survey performed in an archaeo-
logical site in Albano Laziale, close to Rome.
The investigated area was a Roman villa partial-
ly excavated by archaeologists in previous sur-
veys. The aim of this survey was to define, in a
few days, the presence and position of some
structures that could be investigated in the
planned archaeological excavation (September
2005). Test planning was focused to design a re-
ally fast but exhaustive measurement campaign.
From this point of view, an integrated geophysi-
cal techniques survey (GPR, magnetic, and geo-
electric tomography) was carried out on this ar-
chaeological site. Results from GPR and geo-
electric tomography showed an unexpected good
overlap. On the contrary, the magnetic survey re-
sult did not show clear magnetic anomalies
referable to the buried features. In fact, the mag-
netic survey pointed out an unexpected poor
quality result compared to the other methods

Page 9
299
Fast geophysical prospecting applied to archaeology: results at «Villa ai Cavallacci» (Albano Laziale, Rome) site
probably because of the adverse application con-
ditions (low magnetic contrast between backfill
and remains, heavy human activities perturba-
tion, small area investigated, abandoned steel
materials, etc.). On the whole, the described test
survey was able to detect and define the presence
of some very interesting geophysical anomalies.
During September 2005 a digging campaign
was conducted at the Roman Villa. Thanks to the
results of the geophysical survey, the expected
ancient buried room, well identified by GPR and
geoelectric tomography, was excavated with oth-
er minor finds. These results confirmed, once
more, that integration between geophysical tech-
niques and archaeology is a really powerful tool.
Also a simple acquisition test, if well planned,
can turn into a meaningful survey.
REFERENCES
ANNAN, A.P. and S.W. COSWAY (1992): Ground penetrating
radar survey design, in Proceedings of the SAGEEP,
329-350.
BASILE, V., M.T. CARROZZO, S. NEGRI, L. NUZZO, T. QUAR-
TA and A.V. VILLANI (2000): A ground penetrating
radar survey for archaeological investigations in an ur-
ban area (Lecce-Italy), J. Appl. Geophys., 44, 15-32.
BENSON, A.K. (1995): Application of ground penetrating
radar in assessing some geological hazards: example of
groundwater contamination, faults, cavities, J. Appl.
Geophys., 33, 177-193.
BERNABINI, M., E. BRIZZOLARI and S. PIRO (1988): Im-
provement of signal-to-noise ratio in resistivity pro-
files, Geophys. Prospect., 36 (5), 559-570.
BRIZZOLARI, E., F. ERMOLLI, L. ORLANDO, S. PIRO and L.
VERSINO (1992): Integrated geophysical methods in ar-
chaeological surveys, J. Appl. Geophys., 29 (1), 47-55.
CHIARUCCI, P. (1990): La villa di età romana ai «Cavallac-
ci» in Albano, Quaderni del Centro di Studi per l’Ar-
cheologia Etrusco-Italica, 19 (10.2), 201-204.
DANIELS, D.J. (1996): Surface – Penetrating Radar (Institu-
tion of Electrical Engineers, London, U.K.), pp. 296.
JOL, H.M. and D.G. SMITH (1992): Ground penetrating
radar: recent result, Can. Soc. Explor. Geophys. Rec.,
27, 15-20.
JORDAN, T. and D. COSTANTINI (1999): The use of non-inva-
sive electromagnetic (EM) tecniques for focusing envi-
ronmental investigations, in Ground Conductivity Me-
ters for Environmental Site Evaluation: Selected Pa-
pers and Examples (Geonics Ltd.), pp. 30.
PATELLA, D. (1991): I principi della magnetometria e della
gravimetria. Possibilità di applicazione in archeologia,
in Proceedings of «Geofisica per l’Archeologia», Qua-
derni dell’Istituto per le Tecnologie Applicate ai Beni
Culturali, 1, 71-81.
PELLERIN, L. and P.E. WANNAMAKER (2005): Multi-dimen-
sional electromagnetic modelling and inversion with
application to near-surface Earth investigations, Com-
put. Electron. Agric., 46, 71-102.
WEYMOUNTH, J.W. and R. HUGGINS (1985): Geophysical
surveying of archeological site, in Archeological Geol-
ogy, edited by G. RAPP and J.A. GIFFORD, 191-235.
(received October 10, 2006;
accepted February 23, 2007)