Talk:Ronald McDonald: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:01, 3 November 2009

Weak oppose I see no particular reason for the merger. Both are short articles but both can become bigger. They are clearly two separate ideas even if closely linked. --Matilda (talk) 01:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much. Expansion should solve the issue. Synergy 01:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - pretty much is a bit cryptic? Do you support or oppose?--Matilda (talk) 01:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator - both articles are too short....if/when Ronald's article becomes big enough then split it off.-- ✧ CM 16 04:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose I have to agree with Matilda on the same grounds. A1a2s (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too short isn't a reason for merging, otherwise we must merge several thousand of articles, because they are short. Barras || talk 19:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

joeeeehoee

Revision as of 19:00, 26 August 2009 change Barras (talk \| changes) Patrollers, Rollbackers 23,614 edits no meerge ← Earlier diff		Revision as of 15:01, 3 November 2009 change undo 86.93.232.227 (talk) No edit summary Newer diff →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*Too short isn't a reason for merging, otherwise we must merge several thousand of articles, because they are short. [[User:Barras\|<span style="color:blue">'''Barras'''</span>]] \|\| [[User Talk:Barras\|<span style="color:red">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 19:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)		*Too short isn't a reason for merging, otherwise we must merge several thousand of articles, because they are short. [[User:Barras\|<span style="color:blue">'''Barras'''</span>]] \|\| [[User Talk:Barras\|<span style="color:red">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 19:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

			joeeeehoee