:{{ping|KristiNoem2}} You probably are but I don't think Kinu is a sock of you. [[User:Lights and freedom|Lights and freedom]] ([[User talk:Lights and freedom#top|talk]]) 03:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
:{{ping|KristiNoem2}} You probably are but I don't think Kinu is a sock of you. [[User:Lights and freedom|Lights and freedom]] ([[User talk:Lights and freedom#top|talk]]) 03:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
::I never said Kinu is a sock of me. I told Kinu to tag my user page on the English Wikipedia as a sockpuppet of Orca Vision Inc./JarvisJones95. —[[User:KristiNoem2|KristiNoem2]] <sup>[[User talk:KristiNoem2|Talk]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/KristiNoem2|Contribs]]</sup> <sup>[[User:Orca Vision Inc.|Buy my soap!]]</sup> 03:48, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Revision as of 03:48, 3 September 2022
Formerly known as User:Naddruf
Welcome
Hello! I am assuming you have come over from the English Wikipedia, so you are probably familiar with the way this wiki works. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few links to help you adjust:
There is much to do here. For example, there are a lot of articles that do not exist yet, which you can bring over from the English Wikipedia and simplify. Do have a look around and see what you would like to do. Thank you for joining us, and you know how to contact me if you need help. ThegooduserLet's Talk! :)🍁23:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
QD
Hello. When users remove QD templates, just revert them and warn them on their talk page using {{subst:uw-qd}}. Removing QD templates is not allowed. IWI (chat) 14:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When you use a warn template, please remember to put a "subst:" at the start like this: {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}. This makes it post as a message instead of a template. Also remember to sign afterwards as normal. Thanks, IWI (chat) 18:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, sorry for the trouble but I just noticed that when you mentioned me you did it on the administrators' noticeboard. Why did you do that? Wasn't it more logical to write on my talk or on the IP talk (or better still directly report the IP for vandalism)? Btw you talked about an edit war, like I was doing an edit war, when I was just reverting a clear vandalism... Thanks and best regards --Superpes15 (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply] P.S. I don't want to make controversy. I'm just asking you so I can understand better.
Because it's a dispute, and it has to be solved. The question is whether the pictures should be removed, or placed somewhere else on the page. I don't want to make the decision on the matter, so I'm leaving it to the admins to decide what to do about it. If they choose to block the IP, that's okay with me, but they had a valid point that was worth considering (not that homosexuality should be illegal, of course).Naddruf (talk) 04:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok, you were referring only to the images, but I focused on the vandalism he added "hiddenly" (that's why I continued to rollback) :) Thanks for the clarification and have a nice day --Superpes15 (talk) 07:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why have you taken one subject on the biology introduction page and blown it up out of all proportion? This page is just to tell readers where to find topics. Do we not have a page on ecology? Yes, we do. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can move the section to ecology for now. In the long run I'm hoping to expand the biology article a lot to move it towards being a good article. Naddruf (talk) 05:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, and you can tell me if you see anything wrong. I moved those paragraphs to ecology. I've come to the understanding that articles here don't need to be short, and they can and should cover topics in depth as long as they're simple. Because of that, I'd like to eventually expand biology so it covers all the main topics: biochemistry, cells, genetics, evolution, ecology, zoology, botany, microbiology. And if I'm wrong about this, let me know. Thanks. Naddruf (talk) 07:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Myhammad Ahmad Hashmi son of Muhammad Nawaz live in Battian City Hujra Saha Muqeem district okara study complete Government High school hujra shah muqeem
Aslam o Alaikum to All muslim Muhammad Ahmad Hashmi (talk) 09:41, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: It's okay if you think an RfD should be changed to a QD, but please do it the correct way. In this case an administrator disagreed with you and removed the QD, and then you created an unnecessary second RfD which was exactly the same as the first. Instead of doing this, it's better to add the QD template at the same time as the RfD, or just vote quick delete in the RfD. An administrator is needed to delete anyway. This would prevent this situation from happening. Lights and freedom (talk) 22:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I apologize for vandalism and sockpuppetry. I would like to edit Simple Wikipedia again. If unblocked, I will promise never to edit this project while logged out or with a different account, and never to cause disruption to any Wikimedia project. I can't really prove to you that I won't be disruptive, but I mean it. I understand that because this was a checkuser block, it can only be undone by a checkuser. If this request is declined, I will probably try again in about six months.
Request reason(s):
I apologize for my destructive edits. It has been eight months since my last request. Please unblock me so that I can make constructive edits. I understand that because this was a checkuser block, it can only be undone by a checkuser. I will not use other accounts or abuse Wikipedia again. Lights and freedom (talk) 18:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Giving WP:ROPE enough to either allow this editor to rejoin the community or allow them to remove any further doubt about their intent here. Lights and freedom will be on final warning status until further notice from me or another CU on this project indicates sufficient trust has been restored via a message on this talk page. Until then, this unblock request and the below conversation will be required to remain intact and visible on the talk page. Operator873 connect19:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't remember all other accounts that I've used. Here are some of them: AsianSandwichMan, Anger2honor2sanctity, Asdfq4adf, Hon-hawaii-highway-highly. I used these accounts to damage Wikipedia. I know I created other accounts, where I would have logged in, made some kind of disruptive edit, and then logged out and never looked at that account again. As far as I know, I no longer have access to any other accounts, and they're probably not in my browser history so I couldn't find them. I have not used any other account since the last time I requested unblock (May 2021-August 2021, can't remember), and I will not use any other account in the future. I also previously edited when logged out, and I don't know what IP addresses I used, among other reasons because I no longer live in the place I did before. However, I was responsible for the vandalism at Culture war. I have also not edited while logged out since the last time I requested unblock, and I will not do this in the future. I will never vandalize Wikipedia again, because there is no point. It is a waste of time, both for myself and for the person who would have to revert the vandalism. There are much better things to do with one's life. Lights and freedom (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've given some time for any other CheckUsers to comment if they had anything to say. I've messaged them off-wiki just to be sure so I'll give this another day or two. However, the actions you took 10 months ago are disturbing and present a risk to this community if you are unblocked. I also believe in AGF and hoping that, like others, you can become a member of this community. If I grant an unblock, do you understand that resuming your previous activities would result in an immediate reinstatement of the block, with no warning, no talk page access, and likely no avenues for requesting unblock? Operator873 connect20:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your past vandalism is atrocious and egregious. Not only do I expect to never see that again, but I remove this block with the understanding that you will be on final warning status for a not less than 6 months. I, personally, will be observing your conduct on this wiki and across all projects. When I feel earned sufficient trust to fully rejoin the simplewiki community, I will leave a new message here on your talk page. Until that time, I will also require you to leave this portion of your talk page intact so other sysops are aware of the conditions I unblock you on. I truly do hope to see you reintegrate successfully. Operator873 connect19:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Fehufanga, for the suggestion! I previously thought that a special permission was required for HotCat. Now that you have reminded me about this, I have enabled it and will be using it.
@Umarnla The article is still published. I added an "in use" tag, so you can make changes, and administrators will not delete it. I also added attribution to the talk page.
@Auntof6: Okay. If this is a problem, I will correct it. One question: if a language is spoken in many of the provinces of Pakistan, like Urdu, should I put it in the categories for all the provinces? Or should it only be in the main category? Lights and freedom (talk) 03:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pure Evil, the tone of that message could be.. a little more friendly.. Lights and freedom is only trying to help. Lights and freedom, I can give you flood if you are planning to make 100+ more edits? --Ferien (talk) 21:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lights and freedom, I wouldn't think so. When flood is given, you are closely watched anyway. Just if you abuse flood (by making unrelated, controversial edits) you would probably be blocked as you are on final warning status. --Ferien (talk) 06:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Last I checked, "Be friendly" was not a policy. IF it is, could you link it. If not, Im not your friend and don't care much for your opinion. If there is no violation of policy, your opinion is not needed or wanted. Pure Evil (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pure Evil, I found the message you wrote to be quite rude - which would be in breach of this guideline. No, it's not a policy, but it is a good idea to follow it, and being kind doesn't exactly hurt anyone. --Ferien (talk) 14:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which part of "I don't care much of your opinion" are you having problems understanding? As we are sharing unwanted verbiage, I find your interjections into things that do not concern you and your need to ping me to be rude as well. To reiterate, I don't care what you have to say. If there is no violation of policy, there is no need to annoy me with your useless banter. Further attempts will be ignored on sight. Pure Evil (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pure Evil Your messages are incredibly rude, if lights and freedom or I was to say that we would probably be warned or even blocked. You should write more professionally, and not borderline insult people. Lallint (talk) 00:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lallint I appreciate that you care about civility, but I would prefer if this conversation ended. It was about just one comment, which was several weeks ago. I have no issues with this. Thanks! Lights and freedom (talk) 22:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lights and freedom, it was indeed racism. I was just assuming that it was vandalism because it’s one of those sensitive subjects and I didn’t bother to read the article. Cheers, Hockeycatcat (talk) 04:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How good are you in this realm? I noticed some things in Totalitarianism that are not true. One such example is Nazi Germany is not a modern time example. It was a state and ended in 1945. So definitely not with the idea of “modern times” which is a fancy way of saying the present. If you are so inclined would you be willing to run through the article all together as I noticed you removed some revisions so I didn’t know if you would be interested. If you can ping me either way I’d appreciate it. I’m on mobile so it makes it hard to re-write an article. Thanks! PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done?05:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for posting "Again: Change the languages on the log in page"
It looks to be in danger of dropping off the Simple Talk page for a third time. Previously we got close to a consensus, but then was opposed by one or two people, approached consensus again, but then it just disappeared. I've pushed for this twice to no avail; it may make it through this time if somebody else drives it forward. Thanks, --Gotanda (talk) 03:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't read the template you left on their page, because I thought it was just the automatic welcome message. I didn't realize you could add to it and leave comments inside. Lights and freedom (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Lights and freedom. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience. You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
I saw you posted comments in the voting area and not in Wikipedia:Simple_talk#Additional_comments. I am trying to keep the voting area clean and simple with just the vote and your signature. Would you please move them up there? Also, when you vote, you can just click here so you can vote for all languages at once. I am looking at possibly building some type of module for when we do this again, but not high on the list right now. Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑!22:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lights and freedom No as it gives undue weight in that area. They go up top. We have beaten the topic to death and many things have been repeated over and over. You can put them in that section with one bullet point and list all the reasons, but we do not want one person to influence any direction as this is a RfA type vote, but simpler since the conversation has gone on for years. Then when done, it will be changed by consensus with all votes and everything archived. Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑!22:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Lights and freedom, sorry for interrupting your work but I need to speak about your unblock. You were blocked a year ago, so how did you get unblocked. What guidelines did you follow? I asked this because I was blocked in English Wikipedia for 1 year as sockpuppetry like you, unfortunately I can't retrieve my password of my master-sock. Even CU gave me a clear signal after 6 months inactivity, I didn't get any respond on my unblock request made on May 2022 or something. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 15:39, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TTP1233 I think it depends what the sockpuppetry was. I was blocked for vandalism using other accounts. The admins wouldn't have known unless they did checkuser because there was no obvious connection between this account and the other ones. I didn't edit from other accounts or logged out for about 10 months, then I requested unblock. In the request, I told them specifically what I had done before, that it was almost in a year in the past, and promised not to do it again — this is generally how successful requests work. What specifically were you doing with the other accounts? Lights and freedom (talk) 15:52, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just making a edit warring on adminship participation and creating a non-notable BLP with two account. I tried to resist it with other accounts but failed so I choose to follow the rules and wait for 6 months as per en:WP:SO there in enwiki. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 15:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TTP1233 If you haven't edited at all since your request in May, I think your next unblock request will work. Explain that you had operated multiple accounts, and list all the accounts. Tell them that you are aware that the articles you were writing were non-notable, and that from now on you will only write articles following notability standards, and will only edit using one account. I think they will probably accept a request from this account if you tell them you're locked out of the original account. Lights and freedom (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have made an unblock request on my talk page, but no admin replied except one who was inclined to.. But he told that another admin will review my request. This delay is making me mad. If they reject my request at early, then it's ok, but waiting takes much more time than expected. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 16:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, I was also surprised. If I applied UTRS then why am I active here. I should have done before on that account. Previously it happened on April 2021, exactly a e-mail came to me from UTRS for confirmation through a link but I ignored as I was active in enwiki on this account before CU checks on November 2021. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 16:36, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TTP1233 This is confusing and I don't know what's going on. So I suggest making a new regular unblock request on your talk page, and not mentioning this other stuff unless someone asks about it. Lights and freedom (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. We must ignore about this and keep focusing on Wikipedia. But today I am more sad when PotsDamLamb was blocked. He is a nice guy. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 16:48, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm watching you tag all these. As soon as you finish, I'll do a mass delete because there are so many from the same IP. -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6: I'm done, but there were a few short articles I didn't tag because I wasn't sure if they would be considered complex enough to delete. In my opinion, they should still be deleted; they were still not simple, and some had false claims of being owned by Disney when they aren't. Lights and freedom (talk) 00:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El Panther: I don't think so. This article has been found to be a hoax or non-notable many times, by many different people. Because of this, it has been deleted many times and all of your accounts have been locked. If you can prove to me that it's actually a real, notable sport, then maybe. Lights and freedom (talk) 00:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks...
...for your well wishes on the admins noticeboard. I took a fall and injured an arm and a leg. They will heal, but I've been in a constant low level of pain which makes it hard to type with both hands or concentrate on anything. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Juiceslf (singer)
Hello I decline the QD G4 tag because I have found some notability of releasing song and it went viral, so decided to be discussed with a tagger Supercleaner (talk) 04:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I created the article Juiceslf, although am not good at creating but I wish if you could help me update it and teach me more about updating an article. Steadeeboi (talk) 05:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Derpdart56: There is an IP (92.40.168.0/21) that I discovered after my en.wq page was vandalized, it is likely to be an open proxy. Most of the edits are vandalism or subtle vandalism, but some edits are legitimate. The full range is only blocked on enwiki, but single IPs from the range have been blocked on dozens of wikis. – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done I have removed the comments. Lights and freedom (talk) 22:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)