Doctor en Derecho, Universidad de Barcelona. Profesor de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Address: Santiago, Region Metropolitana, Chile
La facultad del artículo 9° de la ley N° 18.918, orgánica constitucional del Congreso Nacional, h... more La facultad del artículo 9° de la ley N° 18.918, orgánica constitucional del Congreso Nacional, ha sido entendido y utilizada por diputados y senadores para la solicitud de antecedentes que escapan del sentido que tiene dicha norma. Por esta razón, el trabajo busca analizar cuál es el objetivo de la solicitud de antecedentes por parte del Congreso Nacional, su diferencia con la función fiscalizadora de la Cámara de Diputados, y finalmente, si es posible revisar el uso de esta norma como un ejemplo de desviación de poder o de fin.
Spanish Abstract: Este trabajo busca mostrar cómo la jurisprudencia reciente del Tribunal Constit... more Spanish Abstract: Este trabajo busca mostrar cómo la jurisprudencia reciente del Tribunal Constitucional – a través de sentencias de mayoría, votos disidentes y particulares – ha ofrecido argumentos para perfilar una garantía de protección al derecho de propiedad fundada en la determinación del contenido económico de dicho derecho. De esta manera, se propone cuantificar la magnitud de la afectación de la propiedad para efectos de considerar si estamos frente a una privación o limitación – o ninguna de las anteriores –realizando una comparación entre la rentabilidad económica del uso de la propiedad antes de la medida supuestamente limitativa o privativa de dominio, y la existencia de algún uso alternativo de la propiedad razonablemente viable desde el punto de vista económico.
English Abstract: This paper seeks to show how the recent decision of the Constitutional Court - through majority, dissenting and individuals opinions - has offered arguments to outline a guarantee of protection of property rights founded in determining its economic content. Thus, it is proposed to quantify the extent a violation of the property considering whether we are facing a deprivation or restriction - or none of the above –by a comparison of the economic profitability of use of the property before the allegely vulnetarion, and the existence of an alternative use of the property, reasonably practicable from an economic point of view.
Spanish Abstract: I. El desvío de clientela en tiempos de internet. II. El uso de palabras clave ... more Spanish Abstract: I. El desvío de clientela en tiempos de internet. II. El uso de palabras clave en buscadores como forma de desviar clientela en la jurisprudencia chilena. II.I. Una acción por compentencia desleal rechazada: el caso Genytec con Biogenetics. II.II. Una acción de competencia desleal acogida: el caso Acepta.com con SouthConsulting y Google. III. Conclusiones: la importancia del desvío de clientela en internet y la litigación en competencia desleal.
English Abstract: I. The diversion of customers in the Internet. II. The use of keywords in search engines as a way to divert clientele in Chilean jurisprudence. II.I. Rejected an action for unfair compentencia: the case Genytec Biogenetics. II.II. A host of unfair competition action: the case Acepta.com SouthConsulting and Google. III. Conclusions: the importance of diverting internet clientele and unfair competition litigation.
Temas de Protección y Defensa del Consumidor, 2018
Spanish Abstract: Este breve trabajo revisa la posibilidad de reclamaciones de consumidores contr... more Spanish Abstract: Este breve trabajo revisa la posibilidad de reclamaciones de consumidores contra empresas como Uber, que alega ofrecer servicios transnacionales denominados peer-to-peer (P2P) pero limitando, a través de sus términos y condiciones, la posibilidad de interponer acciones judiciales en el país de origen del consumidor. Dado que no es posible acceder a reclamaciones transnacionales eficientes contra una empresa que alega tener su sede de operación en el extranjero, creemos que la solución adoptada en el Perú por el Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual (INDECOPI) es la forma correcta de asegurar los derechos de los consumidores de acuerdo a la legislación interna.
English Abstract: This brief work reviews the possibility of consumer complaints against companies such as Uber, which claims to offer transnational services called peer-to-peer (P2P) but limiting, through its terms and conditions, the possibility of filing legal actions in the country of origin of the consumer. Given that it is not possible to access efficient transnational claims against a company that claims to have its headquarters operating abroad, we believe that the solution adopted in Peru by the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI) is a correct way to ensure consumer rights according to domestic legislation.
Spanish Abstract: En el marco conmemorativo de la dictación del Código de Comercio chileno, de 18... more Spanish Abstract: En el marco conmemorativo de la dictación del Código de Comercio chileno, de 1865, resulta interesante revisar cómo nuestro actual modelo regulatorio es consecuencia de un desarrollo histórico que se inicia con el fomento del liberalismo económico en el siglo XIX, se sumerge en la visión dirigista de la economía imperante en el segundo tercio del siglo XX, para finalmente concluir con un sistema que busca el fomento y protección declarada de la libre competencia en los mercados. Por ende, revisaremos la historia del desarrollo de un sistema de competencia en la economía de nuestro país, para finalizar analizando su actual orgánica y aplicación de las normas de libre competencia.
English Abstract: In the commemorative framework of the Chilean Commercial Code, of 1865, it is interesting to review how our current regulatory model is a consequence of a historical development that begins with the promotion of economic liberalism in the nineteenth century, then continues through a dirigiste vision of the economy prevailing in the second third of the 20th century, to finally conclude with a system that seeks the promotion and declared protection of free competition in the markets. Therefore, we will review the history of the development of our competition system in Chile, to finalize analyzing its current organic and application of competition law.
Estudios de Derecho Comercial - Séptimas Jornadas Chilenas de Derecho Comercial 2016, 2016
Spanish Abstract: El presente trabajo busca analizar la aplicación de los delitos contemplados en... more Spanish Abstract: El presente trabajo busca analizar la aplicación de los delitos contemplados en el antiguo Libro IV del Código de Comercio luego de la promulgación de la ley N° 20.720, revisando la normativa transitoria de dicha ley y la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional de fecha 1 de octubre de 2015. English Abstract: This paper analyzes the offenses in the former Book IV of the Commercial Code after the enactment of Law No. 20,720, reviewing its transitional rules and a judgment of the Constitutional Court dated October 1, 2015.
Spanish Abstract: La facultad del artículo 9° de la ley N° 18.918, orgánica constitucional del Co... more Spanish Abstract: La facultad del artículo 9° de la ley N° 18.918, orgánica constitucional del Congreso Nacional, ha sido entendido y utilizada por diputados y senadores para la solicitud de antecedentes que escapan del sentido que tiene dicha norma. Por esta razón, el trabajo busca analizar cuál es el objetivo de la solicitud de antecedentes por parte del Congreso Nacional, su diferencia con la función fiscalizadora de la Cámara de Diputados, y finalmente, si es posible revisar el uso de esta norma como un ejemplo de desviación de poder o de fin.
English Abstract: The power of article 9 of law No. 18.918, Constitutional Organization of National Congress, has been understood and used by deputies and senators to request background escaping the sense that you have that rule. For this reason, the paper analyzes what the purpose of the request for records by the National Congress, its difference from the oversight function of the House of Representatives, and finally, if possible, review the use of this standard as an example misuse of power or purpose.
Spanish Abstract: El objeto de este documento de trabajo es iniciar una investigación sobre la le... more Spanish Abstract: El objeto de este documento de trabajo es iniciar una investigación sobre la legislación vigente en nuestro país, para determinar si ciertas empresas de transporte de pasajeros como Uber y Cabify – así como cualquier otra que potencialmente pueda ingresar al mercado – actúa bajo el marco legal en este mercado regulado. Por esta razón, el enfoque de este trabajo es el transporte público y privado de pasajeros en zonas urbanas, sin considerar el transporte colectivo.
El presente artículo consta de dos partes. Esta primera parte analiza de manera panorámica la regulación sancionatoria del transporte público y privado de pasajeros. Como se verá, es un estudio fundamentalmente descriptivo, y que permite guiar la discusión regulatoria. En una segunda parte, en cambio, pretendemos revisar críticamente la regulación del transporte público y privado de pasajeros, proponiendo bases para una modificación de los instrumentos de intervención del Estado en este mercado.
English Abstract: The purpose of this working paper is to review the current legislation in Chile to determine whether certain passenger transport companies as Uber and Cabify - as well as any other that may potentially enter the market – are acting under the legal framework in this regulated market. For this reason, the focus of this work is the public and private passenger transport in urban areas, and not public transport.
This article consists of two parts. This first part analyzes a panoramic overview of the punitive regulation of public and private passenger transport. As will be seen, it is essentially a descriptive study, which seeks to serve as a guide in the current regulatory discussion. In a second part, however, we intend to critically review the regulation of public and private passenger transport, proposing a basis for a modification of the instruments of state intervention in this market. .
Spanish Abstract: El objeto de este documento de trabajo es iniciar una investigación sobre la le... more Spanish Abstract: El objeto de este documento de trabajo es iniciar una investigación sobre la legislación vigente en nuestro país, para determinar si ciertas empresas de transporte de pasajeros como Uber y Cabify – así como cualquier otra que potencialmente pueda ingresar al mercado – actúa bajo el marco legal en este mercado regulado. Por esta razón, el enfoque de este trabajo es el transporte público y privado de pasajeros en zonas urbanas, sin considerar el transporte colectivo.
El presente artículo consta de dos partes. En la primera parte se analizó de manera panorámica la regulación sancionatoria del transporte público y privado de pasajeros. En esta segunda parte, en cambio, pretendemos revisar críticamente la regulación del transporte público y privado de pasajeros, proponiendo bases para una modificación de los instrumentos de intervención del Estado en este mercado.
English Abstract: The purpose of this working paper is to review the current legislation in Chile to determine whether certain passenger transport companies as Uber and Cabify - as well as any other that may potentially enter the market – are acting under the legal framework in this regulated market. For this reason, the focus of this work is the public and private passenger transport in urban areas, and not public transport.
This article consists of two parts. The first part analyzes a panoramic overview of the punitive regulation of public and private passenger transport. In this second part, however, we intend to critically review the regulation of public and private passenger transport, proposing a basis for a modification of the instruments of state intervention in this market.
Spanish Abstract: El presente trabajo busca analizar la presunta prohibición constitucional que t... more Spanish Abstract: El presente trabajo busca analizar la presunta prohibición constitucional que tiene el Poder Ejecutivo para comentar sentencias judiciales. El análisis del artículo 76 de la Constitución, en su origen histórico, no da muestras de una prohibición a criticar o comentar resoluciones de los Tribunales de Justicia, pero sí para sustituir la jurisdicción de dicho órgano del Estado. Sin embargo, se han planteado distintas interpretaciones finalistas sobre el tema por parte de destacados profesores, ex ministros de Estado y ex ministros del Tribunal Constitucional que son interesantes de analizar para dilucidar si existe realmente una prohibición al Poder Ejecutivo de comentar o criticar el actuar del Poder Judicial.
English Abstract: This paper analyzes the alleged constitutional prohibition of the executive power to comment rulings of the Judiciary. The analysis of Article 76 of the Constitution, given its historical origin, shows no sign of a prohibition to criticize or comment on rulings of the Courts of Justice, but to substitute the jurisdiction of these tribunals. However, several finalists interpretations on the subject have been raised concerns by prominent professors and former justices of the Constitutional Court that are interesting to analyze, in order to determine whether there really is a ban on the Executive Branch to comment or criticize the actions of the Judiciary.
La facultad del artículo 9° de la ley N° 18.918, orgánica constitucional del Congreso Nacional, h... more La facultad del artículo 9° de la ley N° 18.918, orgánica constitucional del Congreso Nacional, ha sido entendido y utilizada por diputados y senadores para la solicitud de antecedentes que escapan del sentido que tiene dicha norma. Por esta razón, el trabajo busca analizar cuál es el objetivo de la solicitud de antecedentes por parte del Congreso Nacional, su diferencia con la función fiscalizadora de la Cámara de Diputados, y finalmente, si es posible revisar el uso de esta norma como un ejemplo de desviación de poder o de fin.
Spanish Abstract: Este trabajo busca mostrar cómo la jurisprudencia reciente del Tribunal Constit... more Spanish Abstract: Este trabajo busca mostrar cómo la jurisprudencia reciente del Tribunal Constitucional – a través de sentencias de mayoría, votos disidentes y particulares – ha ofrecido argumentos para perfilar una garantía de protección al derecho de propiedad fundada en la determinación del contenido económico de dicho derecho. De esta manera, se propone cuantificar la magnitud de la afectación de la propiedad para efectos de considerar si estamos frente a una privación o limitación – o ninguna de las anteriores –realizando una comparación entre la rentabilidad económica del uso de la propiedad antes de la medida supuestamente limitativa o privativa de dominio, y la existencia de algún uso alternativo de la propiedad razonablemente viable desde el punto de vista económico.
English Abstract: This paper seeks to show how the recent decision of the Constitutional Court - through majority, dissenting and individuals opinions - has offered arguments to outline a guarantee of protection of property rights founded in determining its economic content. Thus, it is proposed to quantify the extent a violation of the property considering whether we are facing a deprivation or restriction - or none of the above –by a comparison of the economic profitability of use of the property before the allegely vulnetarion, and the existence of an alternative use of the property, reasonably practicable from an economic point of view.
Spanish Abstract: I. El desvío de clientela en tiempos de internet. II. El uso de palabras clave ... more Spanish Abstract: I. El desvío de clientela en tiempos de internet. II. El uso de palabras clave en buscadores como forma de desviar clientela en la jurisprudencia chilena. II.I. Una acción por compentencia desleal rechazada: el caso Genytec con Biogenetics. II.II. Una acción de competencia desleal acogida: el caso Acepta.com con SouthConsulting y Google. III. Conclusiones: la importancia del desvío de clientela en internet y la litigación en competencia desleal.
English Abstract: I. The diversion of customers in the Internet. II. The use of keywords in search engines as a way to divert clientele in Chilean jurisprudence. II.I. Rejected an action for unfair compentencia: the case Genytec Biogenetics. II.II. A host of unfair competition action: the case Acepta.com SouthConsulting and Google. III. Conclusions: the importance of diverting internet clientele and unfair competition litigation.
Temas de Protección y Defensa del Consumidor, 2018
Spanish Abstract: Este breve trabajo revisa la posibilidad de reclamaciones de consumidores contr... more Spanish Abstract: Este breve trabajo revisa la posibilidad de reclamaciones de consumidores contra empresas como Uber, que alega ofrecer servicios transnacionales denominados peer-to-peer (P2P) pero limitando, a través de sus términos y condiciones, la posibilidad de interponer acciones judiciales en el país de origen del consumidor. Dado que no es posible acceder a reclamaciones transnacionales eficientes contra una empresa que alega tener su sede de operación en el extranjero, creemos que la solución adoptada en el Perú por el Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual (INDECOPI) es la forma correcta de asegurar los derechos de los consumidores de acuerdo a la legislación interna.
English Abstract: This brief work reviews the possibility of consumer complaints against companies such as Uber, which claims to offer transnational services called peer-to-peer (P2P) but limiting, through its terms and conditions, the possibility of filing legal actions in the country of origin of the consumer. Given that it is not possible to access efficient transnational claims against a company that claims to have its headquarters operating abroad, we believe that the solution adopted in Peru by the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI) is a correct way to ensure consumer rights according to domestic legislation.
Spanish Abstract: En el marco conmemorativo de la dictación del Código de Comercio chileno, de 18... more Spanish Abstract: En el marco conmemorativo de la dictación del Código de Comercio chileno, de 1865, resulta interesante revisar cómo nuestro actual modelo regulatorio es consecuencia de un desarrollo histórico que se inicia con el fomento del liberalismo económico en el siglo XIX, se sumerge en la visión dirigista de la economía imperante en el segundo tercio del siglo XX, para finalmente concluir con un sistema que busca el fomento y protección declarada de la libre competencia en los mercados. Por ende, revisaremos la historia del desarrollo de un sistema de competencia en la economía de nuestro país, para finalizar analizando su actual orgánica y aplicación de las normas de libre competencia.
English Abstract: In the commemorative framework of the Chilean Commercial Code, of 1865, it is interesting to review how our current regulatory model is a consequence of a historical development that begins with the promotion of economic liberalism in the nineteenth century, then continues through a dirigiste vision of the economy prevailing in the second third of the 20th century, to finally conclude with a system that seeks the promotion and declared protection of free competition in the markets. Therefore, we will review the history of the development of our competition system in Chile, to finalize analyzing its current organic and application of competition law.
Estudios de Derecho Comercial - Séptimas Jornadas Chilenas de Derecho Comercial 2016, 2016
Spanish Abstract: El presente trabajo busca analizar la aplicación de los delitos contemplados en... more Spanish Abstract: El presente trabajo busca analizar la aplicación de los delitos contemplados en el antiguo Libro IV del Código de Comercio luego de la promulgación de la ley N° 20.720, revisando la normativa transitoria de dicha ley y la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional de fecha 1 de octubre de 2015. English Abstract: This paper analyzes the offenses in the former Book IV of the Commercial Code after the enactment of Law No. 20,720, reviewing its transitional rules and a judgment of the Constitutional Court dated October 1, 2015.
Spanish Abstract: La facultad del artículo 9° de la ley N° 18.918, orgánica constitucional del Co... more Spanish Abstract: La facultad del artículo 9° de la ley N° 18.918, orgánica constitucional del Congreso Nacional, ha sido entendido y utilizada por diputados y senadores para la solicitud de antecedentes que escapan del sentido que tiene dicha norma. Por esta razón, el trabajo busca analizar cuál es el objetivo de la solicitud de antecedentes por parte del Congreso Nacional, su diferencia con la función fiscalizadora de la Cámara de Diputados, y finalmente, si es posible revisar el uso de esta norma como un ejemplo de desviación de poder o de fin.
English Abstract: The power of article 9 of law No. 18.918, Constitutional Organization of National Congress, has been understood and used by deputies and senators to request background escaping the sense that you have that rule. For this reason, the paper analyzes what the purpose of the request for records by the National Congress, its difference from the oversight function of the House of Representatives, and finally, if possible, review the use of this standard as an example misuse of power or purpose.
Spanish Abstract: El objeto de este documento de trabajo es iniciar una investigación sobre la le... more Spanish Abstract: El objeto de este documento de trabajo es iniciar una investigación sobre la legislación vigente en nuestro país, para determinar si ciertas empresas de transporte de pasajeros como Uber y Cabify – así como cualquier otra que potencialmente pueda ingresar al mercado – actúa bajo el marco legal en este mercado regulado. Por esta razón, el enfoque de este trabajo es el transporte público y privado de pasajeros en zonas urbanas, sin considerar el transporte colectivo.
El presente artículo consta de dos partes. Esta primera parte analiza de manera panorámica la regulación sancionatoria del transporte público y privado de pasajeros. Como se verá, es un estudio fundamentalmente descriptivo, y que permite guiar la discusión regulatoria. En una segunda parte, en cambio, pretendemos revisar críticamente la regulación del transporte público y privado de pasajeros, proponiendo bases para una modificación de los instrumentos de intervención del Estado en este mercado.
English Abstract: The purpose of this working paper is to review the current legislation in Chile to determine whether certain passenger transport companies as Uber and Cabify - as well as any other that may potentially enter the market – are acting under the legal framework in this regulated market. For this reason, the focus of this work is the public and private passenger transport in urban areas, and not public transport.
This article consists of two parts. This first part analyzes a panoramic overview of the punitive regulation of public and private passenger transport. As will be seen, it is essentially a descriptive study, which seeks to serve as a guide in the current regulatory discussion. In a second part, however, we intend to critically review the regulation of public and private passenger transport, proposing a basis for a modification of the instruments of state intervention in this market. .
Spanish Abstract: El objeto de este documento de trabajo es iniciar una investigación sobre la le... more Spanish Abstract: El objeto de este documento de trabajo es iniciar una investigación sobre la legislación vigente en nuestro país, para determinar si ciertas empresas de transporte de pasajeros como Uber y Cabify – así como cualquier otra que potencialmente pueda ingresar al mercado – actúa bajo el marco legal en este mercado regulado. Por esta razón, el enfoque de este trabajo es el transporte público y privado de pasajeros en zonas urbanas, sin considerar el transporte colectivo.
El presente artículo consta de dos partes. En la primera parte se analizó de manera panorámica la regulación sancionatoria del transporte público y privado de pasajeros. En esta segunda parte, en cambio, pretendemos revisar críticamente la regulación del transporte público y privado de pasajeros, proponiendo bases para una modificación de los instrumentos de intervención del Estado en este mercado.
English Abstract: The purpose of this working paper is to review the current legislation in Chile to determine whether certain passenger transport companies as Uber and Cabify - as well as any other that may potentially enter the market – are acting under the legal framework in this regulated market. For this reason, the focus of this work is the public and private passenger transport in urban areas, and not public transport.
This article consists of two parts. The first part analyzes a panoramic overview of the punitive regulation of public and private passenger transport. In this second part, however, we intend to critically review the regulation of public and private passenger transport, proposing a basis for a modification of the instruments of state intervention in this market.
Spanish Abstract: El presente trabajo busca analizar la presunta prohibición constitucional que t... more Spanish Abstract: El presente trabajo busca analizar la presunta prohibición constitucional que tiene el Poder Ejecutivo para comentar sentencias judiciales. El análisis del artículo 76 de la Constitución, en su origen histórico, no da muestras de una prohibición a criticar o comentar resoluciones de los Tribunales de Justicia, pero sí para sustituir la jurisdicción de dicho órgano del Estado. Sin embargo, se han planteado distintas interpretaciones finalistas sobre el tema por parte de destacados profesores, ex ministros de Estado y ex ministros del Tribunal Constitucional que son interesantes de analizar para dilucidar si existe realmente una prohibición al Poder Ejecutivo de comentar o criticar el actuar del Poder Judicial.
English Abstract: This paper analyzes the alleged constitutional prohibition of the executive power to comment rulings of the Judiciary. The analysis of Article 76 of the Constitution, given its historical origin, shows no sign of a prohibition to criticize or comment on rulings of the Courts of Justice, but to substitute the jurisdiction of these tribunals. However, several finalists interpretations on the subject have been raised concerns by prominent professors and former justices of the Constitutional Court that are interesting to analyze, in order to determine whether there really is a ban on the Executive Branch to comment or criticize the actions of the Judiciary.
Uploads
English Abstract: This paper seeks to show how the recent decision of the Constitutional Court - through majority, dissenting and individuals opinions - has offered arguments to outline a guarantee of protection of property rights founded in determining its economic content. Thus, it is proposed to quantify the extent a violation of the property considering whether we are facing a deprivation or restriction - or none of the above –by a comparison of the economic profitability of use of the property before the allegely vulnetarion, and the existence of an alternative use of the property, reasonably practicable from an economic point of view.
English Abstract: I. The diversion of customers in the Internet. II. The use of keywords in search engines as a way to divert clientele in Chilean jurisprudence. II.I. Rejected an action for unfair compentencia: the case Genytec Biogenetics. II.II. A host of unfair competition action: the case Acepta.com SouthConsulting and Google. III. Conclusions: the importance of diverting internet clientele and unfair competition litigation.
English Abstract: This brief work reviews the possibility of consumer complaints against companies such as Uber, which claims to offer transnational services called peer-to-peer (P2P) but limiting, through its terms and conditions, the possibility of filing legal actions in the country of origin of the consumer. Given that it is not possible to access efficient transnational claims against a company that claims to have its headquarters operating abroad, we believe that the solution adopted in Peru by the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI) is a correct way to ensure consumer rights according to domestic legislation.
English Abstract: In the commemorative framework of the Chilean Commercial Code, of 1865, it is interesting to review how our current regulatory model is a consequence of a historical development that begins with the promotion of economic liberalism in the nineteenth century, then continues through a dirigiste vision of the economy prevailing in the second third of the 20th century, to finally conclude with a system that seeks the promotion and declared protection of free competition in the markets. Therefore, we will review the history of the development of our competition system in Chile, to finalize analyzing its current organic and application of competition law.
English Abstract: This paper analyzes the offenses in the former Book IV of the Commercial Code after the enactment of Law No. 20,720, reviewing its transitional rules and a judgment of the Constitutional Court dated October 1, 2015.
English Abstract: The power of article 9 of law No. 18.918, Constitutional Organization of National Congress, has been understood and used by deputies and senators to request background escaping the sense that you have that rule. For this reason, the paper analyzes what the purpose of the request for records by the National Congress, its difference from the oversight function of the House of Representatives, and finally, if possible, review the use of this standard as an example misuse of power or purpose.
El presente artículo consta de dos partes. Esta primera parte analiza de manera panorámica la regulación sancionatoria del transporte público y privado de pasajeros. Como se verá, es un estudio fundamentalmente descriptivo, y que permite guiar la discusión regulatoria. En una segunda parte, en cambio, pretendemos revisar críticamente la regulación del transporte público y privado de pasajeros, proponiendo bases para una modificación de los instrumentos de intervención del Estado en este mercado.
English Abstract: The purpose of this working paper is to review the current legislation in Chile to determine whether certain passenger transport companies as Uber and Cabify - as well as any other that may potentially enter the market – are acting under the legal framework in this regulated market. For this reason, the focus of this work is the public and private passenger transport in urban areas, and not public transport.
This article consists of two parts. This first part analyzes a panoramic overview of the punitive regulation of public and private passenger transport. As will be seen, it is essentially a descriptive study, which seeks to serve as a guide in the current regulatory discussion. In a second part, however, we intend to critically review the regulation of public and private passenger transport, proposing a basis for a modification of the instruments of state intervention in this market. .
El presente artículo consta de dos partes. En la primera parte se analizó de manera panorámica la regulación sancionatoria del transporte público y privado de pasajeros. En esta segunda parte, en cambio, pretendemos revisar críticamente la regulación del transporte público y privado de pasajeros, proponiendo bases para una modificación de los instrumentos de intervención del Estado en este mercado.
English Abstract: The purpose of this working paper is to review the current legislation in Chile to determine whether certain passenger transport companies as Uber and Cabify - as well as any other that may potentially enter the market – are acting under the legal framework in this regulated market. For this reason, the focus of this work is the public and private passenger transport in urban areas, and not public transport.
This article consists of two parts. The first part analyzes a panoramic overview of the punitive regulation of public and private passenger transport. In this second part, however, we intend to critically review the regulation of public and private passenger transport, proposing a basis for a modification of the instruments of state intervention in this market.
English Abstract: This paper analyzes the alleged constitutional prohibition of the executive power to comment rulings of the Judiciary. The analysis of Article 76 of the Constitution, given its historical origin, shows no sign of a prohibition to criticize or comment on rulings of the Courts of Justice, but to substitute the jurisdiction of these tribunals. However, several finalists interpretations on the subject have been raised concerns by prominent professors and former justices of the Constitutional Court that are interesting to analyze, in order to determine whether there really is a ban on the Executive Branch to comment or criticize the actions of the Judiciary.
English Abstract: This paper seeks to show how the recent decision of the Constitutional Court - through majority, dissenting and individuals opinions - has offered arguments to outline a guarantee of protection of property rights founded in determining its economic content. Thus, it is proposed to quantify the extent a violation of the property considering whether we are facing a deprivation or restriction - or none of the above –by a comparison of the economic profitability of use of the property before the allegely vulnetarion, and the existence of an alternative use of the property, reasonably practicable from an economic point of view.
English Abstract: I. The diversion of customers in the Internet. II. The use of keywords in search engines as a way to divert clientele in Chilean jurisprudence. II.I. Rejected an action for unfair compentencia: the case Genytec Biogenetics. II.II. A host of unfair competition action: the case Acepta.com SouthConsulting and Google. III. Conclusions: the importance of diverting internet clientele and unfair competition litigation.
English Abstract: This brief work reviews the possibility of consumer complaints against companies such as Uber, which claims to offer transnational services called peer-to-peer (P2P) but limiting, through its terms and conditions, the possibility of filing legal actions in the country of origin of the consumer. Given that it is not possible to access efficient transnational claims against a company that claims to have its headquarters operating abroad, we believe that the solution adopted in Peru by the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property (INDECOPI) is a correct way to ensure consumer rights according to domestic legislation.
English Abstract: In the commemorative framework of the Chilean Commercial Code, of 1865, it is interesting to review how our current regulatory model is a consequence of a historical development that begins with the promotion of economic liberalism in the nineteenth century, then continues through a dirigiste vision of the economy prevailing in the second third of the 20th century, to finally conclude with a system that seeks the promotion and declared protection of free competition in the markets. Therefore, we will review the history of the development of our competition system in Chile, to finalize analyzing its current organic and application of competition law.
English Abstract: This paper analyzes the offenses in the former Book IV of the Commercial Code after the enactment of Law No. 20,720, reviewing its transitional rules and a judgment of the Constitutional Court dated October 1, 2015.
English Abstract: The power of article 9 of law No. 18.918, Constitutional Organization of National Congress, has been understood and used by deputies and senators to request background escaping the sense that you have that rule. For this reason, the paper analyzes what the purpose of the request for records by the National Congress, its difference from the oversight function of the House of Representatives, and finally, if possible, review the use of this standard as an example misuse of power or purpose.
El presente artículo consta de dos partes. Esta primera parte analiza de manera panorámica la regulación sancionatoria del transporte público y privado de pasajeros. Como se verá, es un estudio fundamentalmente descriptivo, y que permite guiar la discusión regulatoria. En una segunda parte, en cambio, pretendemos revisar críticamente la regulación del transporte público y privado de pasajeros, proponiendo bases para una modificación de los instrumentos de intervención del Estado en este mercado.
English Abstract: The purpose of this working paper is to review the current legislation in Chile to determine whether certain passenger transport companies as Uber and Cabify - as well as any other that may potentially enter the market – are acting under the legal framework in this regulated market. For this reason, the focus of this work is the public and private passenger transport in urban areas, and not public transport.
This article consists of two parts. This first part analyzes a panoramic overview of the punitive regulation of public and private passenger transport. As will be seen, it is essentially a descriptive study, which seeks to serve as a guide in the current regulatory discussion. In a second part, however, we intend to critically review the regulation of public and private passenger transport, proposing a basis for a modification of the instruments of state intervention in this market. .
El presente artículo consta de dos partes. En la primera parte se analizó de manera panorámica la regulación sancionatoria del transporte público y privado de pasajeros. En esta segunda parte, en cambio, pretendemos revisar críticamente la regulación del transporte público y privado de pasajeros, proponiendo bases para una modificación de los instrumentos de intervención del Estado en este mercado.
English Abstract: The purpose of this working paper is to review the current legislation in Chile to determine whether certain passenger transport companies as Uber and Cabify - as well as any other that may potentially enter the market – are acting under the legal framework in this regulated market. For this reason, the focus of this work is the public and private passenger transport in urban areas, and not public transport.
This article consists of two parts. The first part analyzes a panoramic overview of the punitive regulation of public and private passenger transport. In this second part, however, we intend to critically review the regulation of public and private passenger transport, proposing a basis for a modification of the instruments of state intervention in this market.
English Abstract: This paper analyzes the alleged constitutional prohibition of the executive power to comment rulings of the Judiciary. The analysis of Article 76 of the Constitution, given its historical origin, shows no sign of a prohibition to criticize or comment on rulings of the Courts of Justice, but to substitute the jurisdiction of these tribunals. However, several finalists interpretations on the subject have been raised concerns by prominent professors and former justices of the Constitutional Court that are interesting to analyze, in order to determine whether there really is a ban on the Executive Branch to comment or criticize the actions of the Judiciary.