The attention that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has given to public–private partnersh... more The attention that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has given to public–private partnerships in solving global concerns including poverty, sustainable development and climate change has shed new light on the question of duties of corporations in relation to economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights. At the same time, objections to recognizing the obligations of corporations in relation to human rights in general and to ESC rights in particular have continued to be made. At the formal level, these objections are reflected in new distinctions such as between the duties of states and responsibilities of corporations, between primary duties of states and secondary duties of corporations, and between obligations of compliance and obligations of performance. All these objections and distinctions are untenable and serve only to stultify the discourse on business and human rights. The current state of human rights is dynamic, not static; commodious, not stale. There is ample space ...
The traditional view that only states have human rights obligations and, relatedly, that a consti... more The traditional view that only states have human rights obligations and, relatedly, that a constitution operates only vertically has been changing. In Uganda, as is the case in several other African countries, the Constitution expressly states that the rights and freedoms it recognizes must be respected, upheld, and promoted by all persons and organs of state, but the practical implications of this provision remain unexplored. So far, Ugandan courts have shown willingness to hold non-state actors directly responsible for violations of constitutional rights, although they are yet to use the language of horizontality expressly. Furthermore, Ugandan courts do not seem particularly troubled by the principle of subsidiarity which holds that statutory and common law remedies must be pursued first before recourse may be had to direct constitutional remedies. This has made it possible for litigants to bring direct constitutional suits against state and non-state actors in one action or to p...
Traditionally, constitutional rights apply in the public sphere but not in the private sphere. In... more Traditionally, constitutional rights apply in the public sphere but not in the private sphere. In other words, private actors were not bound by human rights. Although often associated with the natural rights theory, the distinction between the public and the private in the application of human rights "antedates modern liberalism by more than two millennia."
States are no longer the sole source of human rights violations. In the context of increasing eco... more States are no longer the sole source of human rights violations. In the context of increasing economic globalisation, non-state actors — particularly transnational corporations (TNCs) — have assumed enormous powers which were once considered to fall within the exclusive preserve of the state. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for states to regulate and control these actors to ensure that they do not commit human rights violations or that they are held accountable for those violations. The UN Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights (UN Norms) adopted in 2003 by the UN Sub-Commission for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights are the most significant step the international community has taken towards developin binding human rights standards for TNCs. Development of the UN Norms was motivated by the need to fill the vacuum created by lapses in the operation of the doctrine of state resp...
The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, ... more The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, govern how countries collectively promote global health security, including prevention, detection, and response to potential global health emergencies such as the ongoing covid-19 pandemic. While Article 44 of this binding legal instrument requires countries to collaborate and assist each other in meeting their respective obligations, recent events demonstrate that the precise nature and scope of these legal obligations are ill-understood. A shared understanding of the level and type of collaboration legally required by the ihr is a necessary step in ensuring these obligations can be acted upon and fully realized, and in fostering global solidarity and resilience in the face of future pandemics. In this consensus statement, public international law scholars specializing in global health consider the legal meaning of Article 44 using the interpretive framework of the Vienna Convention on ...
The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, ... more The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, govern how countries collectively promote global health security, including prevention, detection, and response to global health emergencies such as the ongoing covid-19 pandemic. Countries are permitted to exercise their sovereignty in taking additional health measures to respond to such emergencies if these measures adhere to Article 43 of this legally binding instrument. Overbroad measures taken during recent public health emergencies of international concern, however, reveal that the provision remains inadequately understood. A shared understanding of the measures legally permitted by Article 43 is a necessary step in ensuring the fulfillment of obligations, and fostering global solidarity and resilience in the face of future pandemics. In this consensus statement, public international law scholars specializing in global health consider the legal meaning of Article 43 using the inter...
The attention that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has given to public–private partnersh... more The attention that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has given to public–private partnerships in solving global concerns including poverty, sustainable development and climate change has shed new light on the question of duties of corporations in relation to economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights. At the same time, objections to recognizing the obligations of corporations in relation to human rights in general and to ESC rights in particular have continued to be made. At the formal level, these objections are reflected in new distinctions such as between the duties of states and responsibilities of corporations, between primary duties of states and secondary duties of corporations, and between obligations of compliance and obligations of performance. All these objections and distinctions are untenable and serve only to stultify the discourse on business and human rights. The current state of human rights is dynamic, not static; commodious, not stale. There is ample space ...
The traditional view that only states have human rights obligations and, relatedly, that a consti... more The traditional view that only states have human rights obligations and, relatedly, that a constitution operates only vertically has been changing. In Uganda, as is the case in several other African countries, the Constitution expressly states that the rights and freedoms it recognizes must be respected, upheld, and promoted by all persons and organs of state, but the practical implications of this provision remain unexplored. So far, Ugandan courts have shown willingness to hold non-state actors directly responsible for violations of constitutional rights, although they are yet to use the language of horizontality expressly. Furthermore, Ugandan courts do not seem particularly troubled by the principle of subsidiarity which holds that statutory and common law remedies must be pursued first before recourse may be had to direct constitutional remedies. This has made it possible for litigants to bring direct constitutional suits against state and non-state actors in one action or to p...
Traditionally, constitutional rights apply in the public sphere but not in the private sphere. In... more Traditionally, constitutional rights apply in the public sphere but not in the private sphere. In other words, private actors were not bound by human rights. Although often associated with the natural rights theory, the distinction between the public and the private in the application of human rights "antedates modern liberalism by more than two millennia."
States are no longer the sole source of human rights violations. In the context of increasing eco... more States are no longer the sole source of human rights violations. In the context of increasing economic globalisation, non-state actors — particularly transnational corporations (TNCs) — have assumed enormous powers which were once considered to fall within the exclusive preserve of the state. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for states to regulate and control these actors to ensure that they do not commit human rights violations or that they are held accountable for those violations. The UN Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights (UN Norms) adopted in 2003 by the UN Sub-Commission for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights are the most significant step the international community has taken towards developin binding human rights standards for TNCs. Development of the UN Norms was motivated by the need to fill the vacuum created by lapses in the operation of the doctrine of state resp...
The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, ... more The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, govern how countries collectively promote global health security, including prevention, detection, and response to potential global health emergencies such as the ongoing covid-19 pandemic. While Article 44 of this binding legal instrument requires countries to collaborate and assist each other in meeting their respective obligations, recent events demonstrate that the precise nature and scope of these legal obligations are ill-understood. A shared understanding of the level and type of collaboration legally required by the ihr is a necessary step in ensuring these obligations can be acted upon and fully realized, and in fostering global solidarity and resilience in the face of future pandemics. In this consensus statement, public international law scholars specializing in global health consider the legal meaning of Article 44 using the interpretive framework of the Vienna Convention on ...
The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, ... more The International Health Regulations (ihr), of which the World Health Organization is custodian, govern how countries collectively promote global health security, including prevention, detection, and response to global health emergencies such as the ongoing covid-19 pandemic. Countries are permitted to exercise their sovereignty in taking additional health measures to respond to such emergencies if these measures adhere to Article 43 of this legally binding instrument. Overbroad measures taken during recent public health emergencies of international concern, however, reveal that the provision remains inadequately understood. A shared understanding of the measures legally permitted by Article 43 is a necessary step in ensuring the fulfillment of obligations, and fostering global solidarity and resilience in the face of future pandemics. In this consensus statement, public international law scholars specializing in global health consider the legal meaning of Article 43 using the inter...
Uploads
Papers by Danwood Chirwa