The role of non-scientific factors vis-a-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact
Abstract
In the evaluation of scientific publications' impact, the interplay between intrinsic quality and non-scientific factors remains a subject of debate. While peer review traditionally assesses quality, bibliometric techniques gauge scholarly impact. This study investigates the role of non-scientific attributes alongside quality scores from peer review in determining scholarly impact. Leveraging data from the first Italian Research Assessment Exercise (VTR 2001-2003) and Web of Science citations, we analyse the relationship between quality scores, non-scientific factors, and publication short- and long-term impact. Our findings shed light on the significance of non-scientific elements overlooked in peer review, offering policymakers and research management insights in choosing evaluation methodologies. Sections delve into the debate, identify non-scientific influences, detail methodologies, present results, and discuss implications.
- Publication:
-
arXiv e-prints
- Pub Date:
- April 2024
- DOI:
- 10.48550/arXiv.2404.05345
- arXiv:
- arXiv:2404.05345
- Bibcode:
- 2024arXiv240405345A
- Keywords:
-
- Computer Science - Digital Libraries