Article

ExperiScope: an analysis tool for interaction data

Authors:

François Guimbretiére,

Ken HinckleyAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 1333 - 1342

https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240826

Published: 29 April 2007 Publication History

Abstract

We present ExperiScope, an analytical tool to help designers and experimenters explore the results of quantitative evaluations of interaction techniques. ExperiScope combines a new visualization incorporating aspects of the KLM and the three-state model with an interface helping users to rapidly cluster similar patterns of interactions. The tool makes it easy to identify and compare key patterns of use encountered during data collection. This promotes a deeper understanding of the results of a given evaluation.We illustrate the advantages of this tool by revisiting the data collected for an experiment conducted by Hinckley et al. [19] which compared different mode switching techniques. Our results show that our tool complements the previously reported results by offering insights about error behavior and the impact of mode switching on user performance.By providing a more fine-grained analysis of the data gathered during empirical evaluations, we hope that our tool will improve researchers' understanding of existing and newly developed interaction techniques.

References

[1]

Accot, J. and S. Zhai. Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing. Proceedings of CHI'03, pp. 193--200.

Digital Library

[2]

Anderson, J.R. and M. Matessa, An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 1997. 12(4): p. 391--438.

Digital Library

[3]

Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Instrumental interaction: an interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces. Proceedings of CHI'00, pp. 446--453.

Digital Library

[4]

Bederson, B.B. and J.D. Hollan. Pad++: a zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. Proceedings of UIST'94, pp. 17--26.

Digital Library

[5]

Bier, E.A., M.C. Stone, K. Pier, W. Buxton, and T.D. DeRose. Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface. Proceedings of SigGraph'93, pp. 73--80.

Digital Library

[6]

Buxton, B., Lexical and Pragmatic Considerations of Input Structures. Computer Graphics, 1983. 17(1): p. 31--37.

Digital Library

[7]

Buxton, B. Chunking and Phrasing and the Design of Human-Computer Dialogues. Proceedings of IFIP World Computer Congress, pp. 475--480.

[8]

Buxton, W. Three-State Model of Graphical Input. Proceedings of INTERACT'90, pp. 449--456.

Digital Library

[9]

Card, S.K., T.P. Moran, and A. Newell, The psychology of human-computer interaction. 1983: Erlbaum Associates.

Digital Library

[10]

Card, S.K., J.D. Mackinlay, and G.G. Robertson, A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1991. 9(2): p. 99--122.

Digital Library

[11]

Douglas, S.A. and A.K. Mithal. The effect of reducing homing time on the speed of a finger-controlled isometric pointing device. Proceedings of CHI'94, pp. 411--416.

Digital Library

[12]

Fitts, P.M., The infomation capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954. 47: p. 381--391.

[13]

Fitzmaurice, G., A. Khan, R. Pieké, B. Buxton, and G. Kurtenbach. Tracking Menus. Proceedings of UIST'03, pp. 71--80.

Digital Library

[14]

Gray, W.D., B.E. John, and M.E. Atwood, Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS Analysis for Predicting and Explaining Real-World Task Performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 1993. 8: p. 237--309.

[15]

Grossman, T., K. Hinckley, P. Baudisch, M. Agrawala, and R. Balakrishnan. Hover widgets: using the tracking state to extend the capabilities of pen-operated devices. Proceedings of CHI'06, pp. 861--870.

Digital Library

[16]

Guimbretière, F., Fluid Interaction for High Resolution Wall-size Displays, PhD thesis, Stanford University. 2002

[17]

Guimbretière, F., A. Martin, and T. Winograd, Benefits of Merging Command Selection and Direct Manipulation. Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 2005. 12(3): p. 460--476.

Digital Library

[18]

Hinckley, K., M. Czerwinski, and M. Sinclair. Interaction and modeling techniques for desktop two-handed input. Proceedings of UIST'98, pp. 49--58.

Digital Library

[19]

Hinckley, K., F. Guimbretiere, P. Baudisch, R. Sarin, M. Agrawala, and E. Cutrell. The springboard: multiple modes in one spring-loaded control. Proceedings of CHI'06, pp. 181--190.

Digital Library

[20]

Hutchings, D.R., G. Smith, B. Meyers, M. Czerwinski, and G. Robertson. Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. Proceedings of AVI'04, pp. 32--39.

Digital Library

[21]

John, B., A. Vera, M. Matessa, M. Freed, and R. Remington. Automating CPM-GOMS. Proceedings of CHI'02, pp. 147--154.

Digital Library

[22]

Kieras, D.E., S.D. Wood, K. Abotel, and A. Hornof. GLEAN: a computer-based tool for rapid GOMS model usability evaluation of user interface designs. Proceedings of UIST'95, pp. 91--100.

Digital Library

[23]

Kurtenbach, G., The Design and Evaluation of Marking Menus, PhD thesis, University of Toronto. 1993.

Digital Library

[24]

Lank, E., J. Ruiz, and W. Cowan. Concurrent bimanual stylus interaction: a study of non-preferred hand mode manipulation. Proceedings of GI'06, pp. 17--24.

Digital Library

[25]

Li, Y., K. Hinckley, Z. Guan, and J.A. Landay. Experimental analysis of mode switching techniques in pen-based user interfaces. Proceedings of CHI'05, pp. 461--470.

Digital Library

[26]

Luckham, D. and J. Vera, An Event-Based architecture Definition Language. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 1995. 21(9): p. 717--734.

Digital Library

[27]

Mackay, W.E. Which Interaction Technique Works When? Floating Palettes, Marking Menus and Toolglasses support different task strategies. Proceedings of AVI'02., pp. 203--209.

Digital Library

[28]

Ramos, G., M. Boulos, and R. Balakrishnan. Pressure Widgets. Proceedings of CHI'04, pp. 527--534.

Digital Library

[29]

Raskin, J., The Humane Interface: New Direction for Designing Interactive Systems. 2000: ACM Press.

Digital Library

[30]

Sellen, A., G. Kurtenbach, and B. Buxton, The Prevention of Mode Errors Through Sensory Feedback. Human-Computer Interaction, 1992. 7(2): p. 141--164.

[31]

Vicente, K.J. and G.L. Torenvliet, The Earth is spherical (p < 0.05): alternative methods of statistical inference. Theoritical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2000. 1(3): p. 248--271.

[32]

Zeleznik, R., T. Miller, and A. Forsberg. Pop through mouse button interactions. Proceedings of UIST'01, pp. 195--196.

Digital Library

Cited By

Mahadevan KZhou QFitzmaurice GGrossman TAnderson F(2023)Tesseract: Querying Spatial Design Recordings by Manipulating Worlds in MiniatureProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580876(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580876
Pang YReinecke KJust R(2022)Apéritif: Scaffolding Preregistrations to Automatically Generate Analysis Code and Methods DescriptionsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517707(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517707
Jun EDaum MRoesch JChasins SBerger EJust RReinecke KGuimbretière FBernstein MReinecke K(2019)TeaProceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3332165.3347940(591-603)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3332165.3347940
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

ExperiScope: an analysis tool for interaction data
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Empirical Evaluation of CASE Tools Usage at Nokia

We present the results of a research work targeted to understanding the domains and consequences of CASE tools usage in Nokia. We aim to evaluate the importance of the various CASE tools features, as rated by our developers, and how well such features are ...
Pop-up depth views for improving 3D target acquisition
GI '11: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2011

We present the design and experimental evaluation of pop-up depth views, a novel interaction technique for aiding in the placement or positioning of a 3D cursor or object. Previous work found that in a 3D placement task, a 2D mouse used with multiple ...
Tangible 3D tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and 3D projection
NordiCHI '12: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design

In this paper we present the tangible 3D tabletop and discuss the design potential of this novel interface. The tangible 3D tabletop combines tangible tabletop interaction with 3D projection in such a way that the tangible objects may be augmented with ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2007

1654 pages

ISBN:9781595935939

DOI:10.1145/1240624

General Chair:
Mary Beth Rosson
The Pennsylvania State University, USA
,
Program Chair:
David Gilmore
Intel, USA

Copyright © 2007 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 April 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CHI07

Sponsor:

CHI07: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 28 - May 3, 2007

California, San Jose, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 182 of 840 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

11
Total Citations
View Citations
704
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mahadevan KZhou QFitzmaurice GGrossman TAnderson F(2023)Tesseract: Querying Spatial Design Recordings by Manipulating Worlds in MiniatureProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580876(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3580876
Pang YReinecke KJust R(2022)Apéritif: Scaffolding Preregistrations to Automatically Generate Analysis Code and Methods DescriptionsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517707(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517707
Jun EDaum MRoesch JChasins SBerger EJust RReinecke KGuimbretière FBernstein MReinecke K(2019)TeaProceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3332165.3347940(591-603)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3332165.3347940
Polack Jr. PChen SKahng MBarbaro KBasole RSharmin MChau D(2018)ChronodesACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/31528888:1(1-21)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3152888
Bailly GMalacria S(2013)MenuInspectorProceedings of the 25th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine10.1145/2534903.2534917(103-106)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2534903.2534917
Grossman TMatejka JFitzmaurice GPerlin KCzerwinski MMiller R(2010)ChronicleProceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology10.1145/1866029.1866054(143-152)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1866029.1866054
Ahmad WSulaiman SJohari F(2010)Usability Management System (USEMATE): A web-based automated system for managing usability testing systematically2010 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr)10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716734(110-115)Online publication date: Dec-2010
https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716734
Ramsay NMarshall SPotanin APlimmer BWeber G(2008)Annotating UI architecture with actual useProceedings of the ninth conference on Australasian user interface - Volume 7610.5555/1378337.1378351(75-78)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1378337.1378351
Nakamura TIgarashi TCousins SBeaudouin-Lafon M(2008)An application-independent system for visualizing user operation historyProceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology10.1145/1449715.1449721(23-32)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1449715.1449721
Fitzmaurice GMatejka JKhan AGlueck MKurtenbach GCzerwinski MLund ATan D(2008)PieCursorProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/1357054.1357268(1361-1370)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1357054.1357268
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten