Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1378889.1379009acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

The return of the trivial: problems formalizing collection/item metadata relationships

Published: 16 June 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Formalizing collection/item metadata relationships encounters the problem of trivial satisfaction. We offer a solution related to current work in IR and ontology evaluation.

References

[1]
Foulonneau, M., Cole, T. W., Habing, T. G., & Shreeves, S. L. 2005. Using collection descriptions to enhance an aggregation of harvested item-level metadata. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM Press, New York, NY.
[2]
Guarino, N. and Welty, C. 2004. An overview of OntoClean. In S. Staab and R. Studer, eds, The Handbook on Ontologies. Springer.
[3]
Lalmas, M. 1998. Logical models in information retrieval. Information Processing and Management. 34, 1.
[4]
Palmer, C. 2004. Thematic research collections. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (eds.). Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.
[5]
Sebastiani, F. 1998. On the role of logic in information retrieval, Information Processing and Management 34, 1.
[6]
Van Rijsbergen, C. J., 1986. A non-classical logic for information retrieval. The Computer Journal 29, 6

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Rule categories for collection/item metadata relationshipsProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology10.1002/meet.1450470121847:1(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2011

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
JCDL '08: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
June 2008
490 pages
ISBN:9781595939982
DOI:10.1145/1378889
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 June 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. collections
  2. dublin core
  3. logic
  4. metadata

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

JCDL08
JCDL08: Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
June 16 - 20, 2008
PA, Pittsburgh PA, USA

Acceptance Rates

JCDL '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 33 of 117 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 415 of 1,482 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Rule categories for collection/item metadata relationshipsProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology10.1002/meet.1450470121847:1(1-10)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2011

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media