Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Combinatorial dominance guarantees for problems with infeasible solutions

Published: 12 December 2008 Publication History

Abstract

The design and analysis of approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems is perhaps the most active research area in the theory of combinatorial algorithms. In this article, we study the notion of a combinatorial dominance guarantee as a way for assessing the performance of a given approximation algorithm. An f(n) dominance bound is a guarantee that the heuristic always returns a solution not worse than at least f(n) solutions. We give tight analysis of many heuristics, and establish novel and interesting dominance guarantees even for certain inapproximable problems and heuristic search algorithms. For example, we show that the maximal matching heuristic of VERTEX COVER offers a combinatorial dominance guarantee of 2n − (1.839 + o(1))n. We also give inapproximability results for most of the problems we discuss.

References

[1]
Alon, N., Gutin, G., and Krivelevich, M. 2004. Algorithms with large domination ratio. J. Algor. 50, 118--131.
[2]
Balas, E., and Simonetti, N. 2001. Linear time dynamic programming algorithms for some new classes of restricted TSPs: A computational study. INFORMS J. Comput. 13, 56--75.
[3]
Bellare, M., Goldreich, O., and Sudan, M. 1995. Free bits, PCPs, and non-approximability—towards tight results. In Proceedings of the IEEE 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 422--431.
[4]
Berend, D., Skiena, S., and Twitto, Y. 2006. Dominance certificates for combinatorial optimization problems. submitted.
[5]
Deineko, V., and Woeginger, G. 2000. A study of exponential neighborhoods for the traveling salesman problem and the quadratic assignment problem. Math. Prog., Ser. A 87, 519--542.
[6]
Glover, F., and Punnen, A. 1997. The travelling salesman problem: New solvable cases and linkages with the development of new approximation algorithms. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 48, 502--510.
[7]
Gutin, G., Vainshtein, A., and Yeo, A. 2003. Domination analysis of combinatorial optimization problems. DAMATH: Discrete Applied Mathematics and Combinatorial Operations Research and Computer Science 129.
[8]
Gutin, G., and Yeo, A. 2001. TSP tour domination and hamilton cycle decompositions of regular digraphs. Oper. Res. Lett. 28, 3, 107--111.
[9]
Gutin, G., and Yeo, A. 2002. Polynomial approximation algorithms for the TSP and the QAP with a factorial domination number. Discr. Appl. Math. 119, 1--2, 107--116.
[10]
Gutin, G., Yeo, A., and Zverovich, A. 2002a. Exponential neighborhoods and domination analysis for the TSP. In The Traveling Salesman Problem and its Variations, G. Gutin and A. Punnen, Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Chapter 6, 223--256.
[11]
Gutin, G., Yeo, A., and Zverovich, A. 2002b. Traveling salesman should not be greedy: Domination analysis of greedy-type heuristics for the TSP. Disc. Appl. Math. 117, 1--3, 81--86.
[12]
Hassin, R., and Khuller, S. 2001. z-approximations. J. Algor. 41, 429--442.
[13]
Ibarra, O., and Kim, C. 1975. Fast approximation algorithms for knapsack and sum of subset problems. J. ACM 22, 463--468.
[14]
Levin, L. 1986. Average case complete problems. SIAM J. Computing 15, 285--286.
[15]
Phan, V., Skiena, S., and Sumazin, P. 2003. A model for analyzing black-box optimization. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2748. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 424--438.
[16]
Punnen, A., Margot, F., and Kabadi, S. 2001. TSP heuristics: Domination analysis and complexity. Res. rep. 2001-06, Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. Kentucky, Mar.
[17]
Rublineckii, V. 1973. Estimates of the accuracy of procedures in the traveling salesman problem. Num. Math. Comput. Tech. (in Russian) 4, 18--23.
[18]
Sarvanov, V., and Doroshko, N. 1981a. The approximate solution of the traveling salesman problem by a local algorithm that searches neighborhoods of exponential cardinality in quadratic time. Softw.: Algor. Prog. (in Russian) 31, 8--11.
[19]
Sarvanov, V., and Doroshko, N. 1981b. The approximate solution of the traveling salesman problem by a local algorithm that searches neighborhoods of factorial cardinality in cubic time. Soft.: Algor. Prog. (in Russian) 31, 11--13.
[20]
Sperner, E. 1928. Ein satzber untermegen einer endlichen menge. Math. Zeitschr. 27, 285--286.
[21]
Valient, L. 1979. The complexity of computing the permanent. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 8, 189--201.
[22]
Zemel, E. 1981. Measuring the quality of approximate solutions to zero-one programming problems. Math. Oper. Res. 6, 319--332.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Combinatorial dominance guarantees for problems with infeasible solutions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
    ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 5, Issue 1
    November 2008
    281 pages
    ISSN:1549-6325
    EISSN:1549-6333
    DOI:10.1145/1435375
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 December 2008
    Accepted: 01 September 2007
    Revised: 01 August 2007
    Received: 01 March 2006
    Published in TALG Volume 5, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Computation complexity
    2. algorithms analysis
    3. approximation algorithms
    4. dominance analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Domination Analysis in Combinatorial OptimizationEncyclopedia of Optimization10.1007/978-3-030-54621-2_136-1(1-12)Online publication date: 8-May-2024
    • (2018)Dominance Certificates for Combinatorial Optimization ProblemsOptimization Problems in Graph Theory10.1007/978-3-319-94830-0_6(107-122)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2018
    • (2015)Average value of solutions for the bipartite boolean quadratic programs and rounding algorithmsTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2014.11.008565:C(77-89)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2015
    • (2015)An approximate method to compute a sparse graph for traveling salesman problemExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.03742:12(5150-5162)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2015
    • (2015)A domination algorithm for {0,1}-instances of the travelling salesman problemRandom Structures & Algorithms10.1002/rsa.2060048:3(427-453)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2015
    • (2013)A Representation Model for TSP2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications & 2013 IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing10.1109/HPCC.and.EUC.2013.38(204-209)Online publication date: Nov-2013
    • (2013)Domination analysis of algorithms for bipartite boolean quadratic programsProceedings of the 19th international conference on Fundamentals of Computation Theory10.1007/978-3-642-40164-0_26(271-282)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2013
    • (2008)Dominance guarantees for above-average solutionsDiscrete Optimization10.1016/j.disopt.2007.11.0095:3(563-568)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008
    • (2008)Worst case analysis of Max-Regret, Greedy and other heuristics for Multidimensional Assignment and Traveling Salesman ProblemsJournal of Heuristics10.1007/s10732-007-9033-314:2(169-181)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media