Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2063576.2063886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Fact-based question decomposition for candidate answer re-ranking

Published: 24 October 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Factoid questions often contain one or more assertions (facts) about their answers. However, existing question-answering (QA) systems have not investigated how the multiple facts may be leveraged to enhance system performance. We argue that decomposing complex factoid questions can benefit QA, as an answer candidate is more likely to be correct if multiple independent facts support it. We categorize decomposable questions as parallel or nested, depending on processing strategy required. We present a novel decomposition framework---for parallel and nested questions---which can be overlaid on top of traditional QA systems. It contains decomposition rules for identifying fact sub-questions, a question-rewriting component and a candidate re-ranker. In a particularly challenging domain for our baseline QA system, our framework shows a statistically significant improvement in end-to-end QA performance.

References

[1]
D. Ferrucci, E. Brown, J. Chu-Carroll, J. Fan, D. Gondek, A. Kalyanpur, A. Lally, J. W. Murdock, E. Nyberg, J. Prager, and N. Schlaefer. Building Watson: An overview of the DeepQA project. AI Magazine, 2010.
[2]
S. Hartrumpf. Semantic Decomposition for Question Answering. In Proceedings of ECAI-18, Greece, 2008.
[3]
B. Katz, G. Borchardt, and S. Felshin. Syntactic and Semantic Decomposition Strategies for Question Answering from Multiple Sources. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Inference for Textual Question Answering, pages 35--41, Pittsburgh, PA, July 2005.
[4]
F. Lacatusu, A. Hickl, and S. Harabagiu. The Impact of Question Decomposition on the Quality of Answer Summaries. In Proceedings of LREC-5, Italy, 2006.
[5]
Q. McNemar. Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or Percentages. Psychometrika, 12(2):153--157, 1947.
[6]
E. Saquete, P. Martínez-Barco, R. Muñoz, and J. Vicedo. Splitting Complex Temporal Questions for Question Answering Systems. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACL, Spain, July 2004.
[7]
I. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining-Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan--Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2000.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Semantic Parsing and Text Generation of Complex Questions Answering Based on Deep Learning and Knowledge Graph2021 4th International Conference on Robotics, Control and Automation Engineering (RCAE)10.1109/RCAE53607.2021.9638851(201-207)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2021
  • (2014)QUADSProceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval10.1145/2600428.2609606(375-384)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2014
  • (2012)Special questions and techniquesIBM Journal of Research and Development10.1147/JRD.2012.218739256:3(365-377)Online publication date: 1-May-2012

Index Terms

  1. Fact-based question decomposition for candidate answer re-ranking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
    October 2011
    2712 pages
    ISBN:9781450307178
    DOI:10.1145/2063576
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 October 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. question answering
    2. question decomposition

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    CIKM '11
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Semantic Parsing and Text Generation of Complex Questions Answering Based on Deep Learning and Knowledge Graph2021 4th International Conference on Robotics, Control and Automation Engineering (RCAE)10.1109/RCAE53607.2021.9638851(201-207)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2021
    • (2014)QUADSProceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval10.1145/2600428.2609606(375-384)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2014
    • (2012)Special questions and techniquesIBM Journal of Research and Development10.1147/JRD.2012.218739256:3(365-377)Online publication date: 1-May-2012

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media