Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Process-oriented application systems for mobile services: empirical analysis of healthcare professionals' intention

Published: 01 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

A growing number of rescue operations as well as people in need of care cause an increase in ambulant healthcare services. At the same time, the dedicated service providers have to cope with budgets and a decreasing number of qualified personnel. Nevertheless, a high quality of treatment is mandatory. This means a need for improvement enabling the service providers to keep their care processes competitive. Whereas in hospitals, evidence-based guidelines and care pathways have become usual or mandatory, efforts to establish them in ambulant domains are still at an early stage. In contrast to inpatient workflows, standards or best practices have not been established yet. The article analyzes the staffs' intention to use such IT-based support by means of empirical surveys among 444 participants from two fields of application. For this purpose, prospective users would employ applications installed on portable devices -- a potential hardly been considered yet for healthcare service support.

References

[1]
Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., and Day, G. S. Marketing Research. Wiley, New York, 1998.
[2]
Åkesson, K. M., Saveman, B.-I., and Nilsson, G. Health care consumers' experiences of information communication technology - a summary of literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76, 9 (2007), 633--645.
[3]
Alagöz, F., Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W., and Valdez, A. C. Openness to Accept Medical Technology - A Cultural View. Proceedings 7th USAB (Graz/Austria, November 2011), LNCS vol. 7058, Springer, 151--170.
[4]
Albrecht, M., Wolf-Ostermann, K., and Friesacher, H. Medical care and technology: Conventional or IT-based medical care documentation -- does reality reflect the academic discourse? Pflegewissenschaft 12, 1 (2010), 34--36.
[5]
Anderson, J. G. Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76, 5-6 (2007), 480--483.
[6]
BMBF. BMBF-Onlineumfrage zur assistierten Pflege von morgen. German Federal Ministry for Education & Research, Bonn, 2011 (in German).
[7]
Bates, D. W., O'Neil, A. C., Boyle, D., et al. Potential Identifiability and Preventability of Adverse Events Using Information Systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assn. 1, 5 (1994), 404--411.
[8]
Berg, M., and Toussaint, P. The mantra of modeling and the forgotten powers of paper: a sociotechnical view on the development of process-oriented ICT in health care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 69, 2-3 (2003), 223--234.
[9]
Birkhofer, A., Deibert, S., and Rothlauf, F. Critical success factors for mobile field service applications: A case research. Proceedings of 8th Wirtschaftsinformatik (Karlsruhe/Germany, February/March 2007), Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, 291--308.
[10]
Brady, R. R. W., Wasson, A., Stirling, I., McAllister, C., and Damani, N. N. Is your phone bugged? The incidence of bacteria known to cause nosocomial infection on health care workers' mobile phones. J. Hosp. Infect. 62, 1 (2006), 123--125.
[11]
Breitschwerdt, R., Robert, S., and Thomas, O. Mobile Application Systems for Home Care: Requirements Analysis & Usage Potentials. Proceedings of 17th AMCIS (Detroit MI, August 2011), AIS, Paper 152.
[12]
Brokmann, J., and Rossaint, R. (eds.). Repetitorium Notfallmedizin. Springer, Berlin, 2010 (in German).
[13]
Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvönen, K., Puhakainen, J., and Walden, P. Adoption of Mobile Devices/Services -- Searching for Answers with the UTAUT. Proceedings 39th HICSS (Kauai HI, January 2006), IEEE, 10 pages.
[14]
DESTATIS. Pflegestatistik 2009. Ländervergleich -- ambulante Pflegedienste. German Federal Statistical Office, Wiesbaden, 2011 (in German).
[15]
Davis, F. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quart. 13, 3 (1989), 319--340.
[16]
Fleischmann, N. Attitudes of Nurses towards Electronic Documentation A Literature Research. Pflegewissenschaft 11, 3 (2009), 161--169.
[17]
Frank, U. Towards a Pluralistic Conception of Research Methods in Information Systems Research. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 2006.
[18]
Frank, U. Outline of a Method for Designing Domain-Specific Modelling Languages. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 2010.
[19]
Gianchandani, E. P. Toward smarter health and well-being: an implicit role for networking and information technology. J. Inf. Technol. 26, 2 (2011), 120--128.
[20]
Giehoff, C., Hübner, U., and Stausberg, J. The Systematic Knowledge Transfer in Nursing via a Knowledge Management System. Pflegewissenschaft 11, 1 (2009), 41--48.
[21]
Hegde, V., and Raheja, D. Design for reliability in medical devices. Proceedings of the 39th Annual RAMS (San José CA, January 2010), IEEE, 6 pages.
[22]
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quart. 28, 1 (2004), 75--105.
[23]
Hübner, U., and Sellemann, B. Current and future use of ICT for patient care and management in German acute hospitals -- a comparison between the nursing and the hospital managers' perspectives. Method Inform. Med. 44, 4 (2005), 528--536.
[24]
Hübner, U. Nursing Informatics: state of the art and future of a subspecialty in nursing. Pflege 17, 5 (2004), 339--349.
[25]
Jha, A. K., Doolan, D., Grandt, D., Scott, T., and Bates, D. W. The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int. J. Med. Inform. 77, 12 (2008), 848--854.
[26]
Kaplan, B., and Duchon, D. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems. MIS Quart. 12, 4 (1988), 571--586.
[27]
Ketikidis, P., Dimitrovski, T., Bath, P., and Lazuras, L. Acceptance of Health Information Technology in Health Professionals: An Application of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Proceedings of the 15th ISHIMR (Zurich/Switzerland, September 2011), J R Collis, 11 pages.
[28]
Lapointe, L., Mignerat, M., and Vedel, I. The IT productivity paradox in health: a stakeholder's perspective. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80, 2 (2011), 102--115.
[29]
Lazar, J., Feng, J., and Hochheiser, H. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Wiley, Chichester, 2010.
[30]
Legner, C., Nolte, C., and Urbach, N. Evaluating Mobile Business Applications in Service and Maintenance Processes: Results of a Quantitative Empirical Study. Proceedings 19th ECIS (Helsinki/Finland, June 2011), AIS, Paper 247.
[31]
Lenz, R., and Reichert, M. IT support for healthcare processes -- premises, challenges, perspectives. Data & Knowl. Eng. 61, 1 (2007), 39--58.
[32]
Lin, S. P. Determinants of adoption of Mobile Healthcare Service. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 9, 3 (2011), 298--315.
[33]
Littlejohns, P., Wyatt, J. C., and Garvican, L. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. Brit. Med. J. 326, 7394 (2003), 860--863.
[34]
Maass, W. and Varshney, U. Design and Evaluation of Ubiquitous Information Systems and Use in Healthcare. Decis. Support Syst. Online First (2012).
[35]
Mohamed, A. H. H. M., Tawfik, H., Al-Jumeily, D., and Norton, L. MoHTAM: A Technology Acceptance Model for Mobile Health Applications. Proceedings 4th DeSE (Dubai/UAE, December 2011), IEEE, 13--18.
[36]
Mouttham, A., Kuziemsky, C., Langayan, D., Peyton, L., and Pereira, J. Interoperable support for collaborative, mobile, and accessible health care. Inf. Syst. Front. 14, 1 (2012), 73--85.
[37]
Oates, B. J. Researching information systems and computing. Sage, London, 2006.
[38]
Pedersen, R., Ellingsen, G., and Monteiro, E. The Standardized Nurse: Mission Impossible? Proceedings IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference (Turku/Finland, June 2011), IFIP vol. 356, Springer, 163--178.
[39]
Pravikoff, D. S., Faan, A. B., and Pierce, S. T. Readiness of U. S. nurses for evidence-based practice. Am. J. Nurs. 105, 9 (2005), 40--51.
[40]
Pryss, R., Tiedeken, J., Kreher, U., and Reichert, M. Towards Flexible Process Support on Mobile Devices. Proceedings 6th CAiSE Forum (Hammamet/Tunisia, June 2010), LNBIP vol. 72, Springer, 150--165.
[41]
Rohner, P., Winter, R., Blobel, B., Indra, P., Kirn, S., and Zimmermann, H.-D. Was kann die Wirtschaftsinformatik dazu beitragen, E-Health voran zu bringen? Wirtschaftsinf. 50, 4 (2008), 330--334 (in German).
[42]
Rügge, I. Mobile Solutions. Dissertation, University of Bremen. DUV, Wiesbaden, 2007.
[43]
Sadeghi, P., Benyoucef, M., and Kuziemsky, C. E. A mashup based framework for multi level healthcare interoperability. Inf. Syst. Front. 14, 1 (2011), 57--72.
[44]
Sarshar, K., Loos, P., and Weber, M. Einsatz der Informationsmodellierung bei der Einführung betrieblicher Standardsoftware. Wirtschaftsinf. 48, 2 (2006), 120--127 (in German).
[45]
Schaffers, H. Innovation and systems change: the example of mobile, collaborative workplaces. AI & Soc. 19, 4 (2005), 334--347.
[46]
Skorning, M., Bergrath, S., Rörtgen, D., et al. E-health in emergency medicine -- the research project Med-on-@ix. Anaesthesist 58, 3 (2009), 285--292.
[47]
Steffan, S., and Wolf-Ostermann, K. Nursing informatics in the curricula. HBScience 1, 3 (2010), 86--91.
[48]
UN-Vodafone Foundation Partnership. mHealth for Development. VitalWave Consulting, Washington D. C., 2009.
[49]
Upham, S. P., and Small, H. Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics 83, 1 (2009), 15--38.
[50]
Vannieuwenborg, F., Kirtava, Z., Lambrinos, L., van Ooteghem, J., and Verbrugge, S. Implications of mHealth Service Deployments: A Comparison between Dissimilar European Countries. In: Telecommunication Economics. LNCS vol. 7216. Springer (2012), 56--66.
[51]
Varshney, U. Pervasive Healthcare and Wireless Health Monitoring. Mobile Netw. Appl. 12, 2-3 (2007), 113--127.
[52]
Winston, P. H. Learning and reasoning by analogy. Commun. ACM 23, 12 (1980), 689--703.
[53]
Winter, M. H.-J., Maaz, A., and Kuhlmey, A. Outpatient and inpatient medical care of the elderly. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 49, 6 (2006), 575--582.
[54]
Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-C., and Lin, L.-M. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 76, 1 (2007), 66--77.
[55]
Wälivaara, B.-M., Andersson, S., and Axelsson, K. Views on technology among people in need of health care at home. Int. J. Circumpol. Heal. 68, 2 (2009), 158--169.
[56]
Zayas-Cabán, T., and Chaney, K. Improving Consumer Health IT Application Development: Lessons from Other Industries, a Summary. ACM SIGHIT Record 1, 2 (2011), 4--12.
[57]
Zhang, H., Cocosila, M., and Archer, N. Factors of adoption of mobile information technology by homecare nurses: a technology acceptance model 2 approach. CIN-Comput. Inform. Nu. 28, 1 (2010), 49--56.
[58]
Ziegler, V., Rashid, A., Müller-Gorchs, M., et al. Mobile computing systems in preclinical care of stroke. Results of the Stroke Angel initiative within the BMBF project PerCoMed. Anaesthesist 57, 7 (2008), 677--685.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)A systematic review of factors influencing the effective use of mHealth apps for self-care2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)10.1109/ICCOINS.2016.7783213(191-196)Online publication date: Aug-2016
  • (2015)Relapse prevention in drug addictionAI & Society10.1007/s00146-014-0544-930:1(31-43)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGHIT Record
ACM SIGHIT Record  Volume 2, Issue 2
September 2012
48 pages
EISSN:2158-8813
DOI:10.1145/2384556
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2012
Published in SIGHIT Volume 2, Issue 2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ambulant healthcare services
  2. empirical survey
  3. mobile application systems
  4. process-oriented information systems
  5. treatment workflows

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)A systematic review of factors influencing the effective use of mHealth apps for self-care2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)10.1109/ICCOINS.2016.7783213(191-196)Online publication date: Aug-2016
  • (2015)Relapse prevention in drug addictionAI & Society10.1007/s00146-014-0544-930:1(31-43)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media